How snail shells are unravelling the ancient secret of asymmetry

Researchers have identified the gene responsible for the asymmetrical twisting of snail shells.

Photo illustration/Photography by Esther de Roij and Gary McDowell, digital composition by Jeremy Guay, Peregrine Creative.
Sinistral and dextral pond snails (Lymnaea stagnalis) and tadpoles (Xenopus laevis) are pictured. Sinistral snail is on left.

For most animals, symmetry is only skin deep, and new research could help us understand why.

In a study published Thursday in Current Biology, scientists identified the gene responsible for asymmetrical development in frogs and pond snails. In doing so, they hope to further understand how – and why – asymmetry arose as a preferred body plan in the animal world.

Most animals appear bilaterally symmetrical. They have obvious left and right sides, and each side is an approximate mirror image of the other. But this symmetry is only skin deep. Internal organs are almost always arranged asymmetrically inside the body. With the exception of radially symmetrical organisms like jellyfish and sea anemones, this appears to be a general rule of animal biology.

“Outward symmetry is probably best for efficient movement,” lead author Angus Davison suggests, “whereas inward asymmetry is probably best because it is the most effective way to pack a series of sometimes asymmetric organs into a tight space.”

For most animals, the direction of asymmetry is invariable – except in extremely rare instances, the human heart is always on the left. But some species of pond snail, which sport their asymmetry in the form of coiled shells, flout that rule a bit.

Chirality, or an inherited variation in shell coiling and body asymmetry, occurs in up to 10 percent of all snail species. So while each species has a common coiling type – in most species, clockwise-coiling snails make up the majority – a small population of individuals have shells that twist in the opposite direction.

That doesn’t sound like a major change, but it can have serious biological implications.

“One of the oddities is that, because the snail bodies are mirror imaged, the rare coiling type will have difficulty trying to find a mate,” says Dr. Davison, who is an associate professor of evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham. “That means that the gene variant that determines the difference will tend to go extinct.”

In 2001, while living in Japan, Davison became fascinated with the rare coiling type and sought to identify the gene responsible for the mutation. With the help of high-end DNA sequencing techniques, Davison and colleagues mapped the pond snail genome. They determined that a tiny change – “one letter, or base, in the one billion that make up a snail’s genome,” Davison says – flipped the switch from clockwise to counter-clockwise.

The mutation occurred in a single gene called formin, which is active in the early embryos of pond snails. Researchers found that the same gene played a role in organizing the internal organs of developing frogs.

They also found that, by delivering an anti-formin drug treatment to developing snails, they could reverse the twisting direction of their shells, but at a cost: the treated snails did not survive.

“At the cellular level, the genes determining asymmetry are so important that any changes in them will tend to be lethal,” Davison says. “It is very difficult to change asymmetry without also changing other important functions.”

Davison and colleagues suspect that formin is one of the earliest “symmetry-breaking” genes in bilateral animals. This suggests that asymmetry is an ancient trait, derived from “a common asymmetry of the cell.” In order to further unravel the symmetry-breaking event, Davison and colleagues plan to dig deeper into pond genetics in future studies. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How snail shells are unravelling the ancient secret of asymmetry
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today