Earth as sponge? It has absorbed enough water to slow sea level rise

About 3.2 trillion tons of water has been taken up by soils, lakes and underground aquifers in regions of Earth battered by rain and flooding in the last decade, say scientists, slowing sea level rise by 20 percent.

Scott Smith/AP/File
Chris White, general manager of the Central California Irrigation District, explains the expense of sinking land near Dos Palos, Calif. Four years of drought and heavy reliance on pumping of groundwater have made the land sink faster than ever up and down the Central Valley, requiring repairs to infrastructure that experts say are costing billions of dollars.

Several regions of Earth that have been battered by rain and floods in the last decade have absorbed enough water to slow global sea level rise by about 20 percent over that time period, scientists say.

And, at least for now, this phenomenon has offset the impact of melting ice sheets, glaciers, and pumping of too much groundwater for irrigation, which also contributes to sea level rise when the water is sprayed on plants, then evaporates into the atmosphere and precipitates back into the ocean in a natural cycle.

"We always assumed that people's increased reliance on groundwater for irrigation and consumption was resulting in a net transfer of water from the land to the ocean," said John T. Reager, a hydrologist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. in an announcement.

"What we didn't realize until now is that over the past decade, changes in the global water cycle more than offset the losses that occurred from groundwater pumping, causing the land to act like a sponge – at least temporarily," he said.

About 3.2 trillion tons of water has been taken up by soils, lakes and underground aquifers in places like the northern Amazon, eastern Australia, parts of the north-central United States, southern Canada, and southeastern Africa. That is enough to fill Lake Huron, the world’s seventh-largest lake, says a team of scientists, led by Dr. Reager, in a study published February 12 in the journal Science.

These trends were observed for the first time by using data collected from a NASA mission called Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), which is a pair of satellites that orbit Earth constantly measuring the tiny variations in the planet’s gravity field to determine the changes in the amount of water across Earth's surface.

Reager’s findings help explain why sea level rise slowed between 2002 and 2014, despite warmer temperatures on Earth that have continue to melt glaciers and ice sheets, the primary contributors to rising seas along with thermal expansion, or ocean water that’s heating up from a warmer climate and causing the water to expand.

“The melting of ice sheets and glaciers is still going on, but it’s being masked,” Reager told The Christian Science Monitor.

The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that overall sea levels are rising at double the rate of the 20th century, or 3.2 millimeters per year, and that it’s “virtually certain” that this trend will continue for many centuries. More sea water is expected to inundate coasts and islands, erode shorelines, and destroy important ecosystems.

But in a short window between 2002 and 2014, sea level rise slowed at times to 2.4 millimeters, and other times 2.9 millimeters per year, as measured by tide gauges in the oceans around the world and from space satellite radar altimeters. Scientists who study ice sheets, glaciers, and ocean temperatures could not explain the anomaly, because contributions to sea level rise were not declining, says Reager.

“Sometimes we can’t close the budget, meaning things don’t add up,” he told the Monitor.  “We think we’re observing everything, but the numbers don’t add up.”

Reager’s team sought to find the missing piece of the sea level equation by analyzing land water data collected by GRACE from 2002 to 2014. Scientists had already suspected that water stored on land could explain the discrepancy, but this had not been measured and quantified until Reager’s experiment.

“It’s the first time that total terrestrial water storage has been monitored,” Marc Bierkens, a hydrology professor at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, who was not involved with the study, told Climate Central. “Not modeled, but monitored — over more than a decade,” he said.

Climate Central reported that other scientists have said the study fills in important data gaps and improves the understanding of how the natural water cycle around the planet affects sea levels.

The next thing scientists want to figure out, says Reager, is why some regions around the globe are storing the extra water.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.