Purple socks and churros: Weird worms earn place on tree of life

The discovery may help finally place these worms in their rightful classification on the tree of life.

Scientists have just identified four very weird-looking worms.

Led by researchers at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography at the University of California-San Diego, the science team helped correctly identify the worms using genetic analysis. One of the species looks a lot like purple socks. Another looks so much like the churro pastry that the worm was named after it. The findings are documented in the Feb. 4 issue of the journal Nature.

The worms can be found in the depths of the ocean, near hydrothermal vents, cold seeps, and whale carcasses. The scientists suspect that the worms call these cold, dark depths home because of the clams and mollusks that live there.

The worms really like eating clams and mollusks, but they have very simple bodies: they only have one body opening, and no eyes or gills. The biggest of the worms, Xenoturbella monstrosa in Monterey Bay, Calif., measures eight inches long. The smallest worm, Xenoturbella hollandorum, is tiny, measuring just one inch long.

Worms like these were first discovered in 1949, and have bothered scientists ever since because they don’t fit into neat definitions. The first discovered worm, Xenoturbella bocki, was initially classified as a flatworm, then later as a simplified mollusk. That definition was thrown off when scientists found out that mollusks form part of these worms’ diet.  

The research team has classified the newly discovered worms as evolutionary simple members of the tree of life. They have categorized them with bilaterally symmetrical animals, which means that they have a line down the center that separates their matching sides.

The team performed several deep-sea expeditions to find these weird and wonderful worms, and looks forward to finding more.

“I have a feeling this is the beginning of a lot more discoveries of these animals around the world,” study lead author Dr. Greg Rouse explained in a press release.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.