Are improved tornado warning systems making a difference?

Steadily improving storm warnings and active preparation for severe weather at the local and state level helped states across the South survive an off-season burst of tornadoes without loss of life.

Paula Merritt /The Meridian Star/AP
Friends and family members help clean up where the home of Darrel and Kristy Shows once stood in Collinsville, Miss., Wednesday, Feb. 3. Lauderdale County Sheriff Billy Sollie said the tornado damaged homes, toppled trees, and knocked out power.

The Wilkins family of Aliceville, Ala., saw storm warnings on the news, but they were still not expecting their home to receive a direct hit from one of a string of tornadoes across the South on Tuesday and Wednesday. The Wilkins home, like dozens of others in the area, is mostly destroyed, but they are grateful the family is safe, Adam Ganucheau reported for

"Looking at the house yesterday and looking at it today, it's hard to come up with the words to describe how it feels," Bobby Wilkins told Mr. Ganucheau. "All I can do is thank God we're alive."

At least 10 tornadoes left parts of Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee with significant structural damages, but local agencies were prepared by weather alert systems.

While the unusual storm system caused extensive property damages, only minor injuries have been reported so far, according to Sean Breslin for the Weather Channel.

National agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Weather Service (NWS), have made a concerted effort to improve disaster warnings ever since hurricane Katrina killed more than 1,000 people in 2005, Patrik Jonsson wrote for The Christian Science Monitor:

In the past decade, the US has dramatically improved disaster detection and warning efficacy, with lead times for tornado warnings growing from four to 13 minutes, a fact that likely saved lives in the 2013 Moore, Okla., tornado. Much of the progress has come from the increased processing capacity of computers and the ability to integrate very granular radar data with on-the-ground observations.

The next step, though, is communicating this information to residents on the ground. Officials are experimenting with the balance between a measured call for caution and panic-inducing language, as Pete Spotts wrote for The Christian Science Monitor.

The Storm Prediction Center issued an Enhanced risk outlook and as much as 15 minutes warning for the tornadoes in many areas, according to a blog by Dan Satterfield, an on-air meteorologist in the South.

State and local agencies also prepared with on-the-ground relief by Wednesday. Alabama emergency management officials were still in active disaster mode by Thursday morning.

In Georgia, where, ironically enough, February 1st through 5th is "Severe Weather Preparedness Week," Wednesday's state-wide tornado drill was cancelled as the officials turned their attention to issuing actual tornado warnings using all available media.

"We're very fortunate to be talking about loss of property instead of loss of life today," said Art Faulkner, the director of the Alabama Emergency Management Agency, reported. "Local and state officials were clearly prepared for this storm, and their preparedness undoubtedly saved lives."

This is particularly remarkable because February tornadoes are often more dangerous, if less common, than summer tornadoes, The Christian Science Monitor's Bamzi Banchiri reported. They are more likely to touch down after dark because the days are shorter, which makes them harder to spot and means more people are asleep or otherwise unprepared.

This was the case for Anthony Walker, who lives in one of the hardest-hit areas in Alabama and was awakened by the storm.

"It's the first time in about 25 years a tornado hit here," Mr. Walker told "Everybody all the way back down there has damage for about a mile or two."

He and his neighbors worked through the night to salvage what they could from wrecked homes. 

"We made it around to all the houses and I'm glad everybody got out," Devodrick Jackson told "I don't really care about the materialistic stuff, I'm just glad no one got badly injured or killed."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to