What can a 45,000-year-old mammoth carcass say about human history?

Scientists unearthed evidence, in the form of a hunted mammoth, that humans were living remarkably far North in Siberia thousands of years earlier than previously thought. These findings could have implications for human history across the globe.

Courtesy of Pitulko et al., Science
Excavations of the mammoth carcass from channel deposits unit. In this photo, Sergey Gorbunov is excavating the mammoth carcass.

Living above the Arctic circle provides a suite of challenges for humans, particularly during the last Ice Age. They would have struggled to keep warm and gather the necessary resources to survive the severe landscape, or so we thought.

New research suggests anatomically modern humans may have lived remarkably far North in central Siberia as early as 45,000 years ago, a feat that would mean our ancestors were more technologically advanced than we previously believed.

And this finding could have significant implications for the history of human migration, including the peopling of the Americas, according to a new paper published Friday in the journal Science.

Scientists announce this discovery based on clues from a strange source: a dead mammoth. The researchers unearthed mammoth bones with distinctive cut marks that suggested this animal fell victim to a band of hunters. Bits of stone, as if broken from a weapon, were even embedded in some of the slices. 

"This is well-supported evidence for humans being that far North at 45,000 years ago," study lead author Vladimir Pitulko tells The Christian Science Monitor in an interview. 

This isn't the first time scientists have discovered evidence that humans lived in Siberia at the time. In 2014, scientists sequenced the genome of a 45,000-year-old man discovered in western Siberia, but he was discovered around the 57 degrees North latitude line. The new find extends that populated region to nearly 72 degrees North. 

"That's a huge difference which gives us a new impression of how people would be spreading across the planet," Dr. Pitulko says.

A mammoth discovery of human adaptability

Knowing modern humans were surviving in the challenging environment that is the Arctic so long ago says a lot about their technological capabilities and adaptability, says Ted Goebel, interim head of the department of anthropology at Texas A&M University, who was not affiliated with the study. If they were successfully populating the region, he says, "They were very quick on their feet in terms of developing new technologies and adapting to new environmental conditions that they had never faced before."

And it wasn't just the Arctic. Around the same time, modern humans were migrating into high-elevation regions, the islands of Indonesia and deserts across Eurasia, Dr. Goebel points out in an interview with the Monitor. 

From Siberia to the Americas

This discovery could actually help explain the peopling of the Americas. The researchers' findings situate human populations quite nearby, or perhaps along, the path that humans took from Eurasia to the Americas. 

What is now the Bering Strait was a strip of land during the last Ice Age, as the glaciers drew water out of the oceans, lowering sea levels. The so-called land bridge stretched from Siberia to present-day Alaska.

But for humans to migrate over the land bridge, they would have to pass through parts of the Arctic. 

"In order for humans to get to the Americas, they had to have first developed these Arctic technologies and adaptations," Goebel says. "Not because in places like Texas, where I live, you need to know how to live in the Arctic, but to get to Texas, you had to pass through the Arctic. There's this need for that condition first and we used to think that that condition developed 20,000 years ago."

So if humans were able to survive in such an environment and were nearby some 45,000 years ago, perhaps humans made it to present-day Alaska and beyond much earlier than previously thought. 

Which humans?

"It's a smoking gun," Goebel says of the find. Humans were living far north in Siberia some 45,000 years ago. 

But, with only evidence of mammoth hunters, we can't be completely sure that it was modern humans, Homo sapiens, that made the cut marks on the bones. Perhaps it was a late-surviving group of an archaic human species in the region, Goebel suggests. 

Neanderthals and their close cousins, Denisovans, could be other candidates. What it hinges on is whether the archaic humans were capable of the technologies necessary to hunt the mammoth and survive so far North. Most scientists don't think they were so advanced.

If researchers discover human remains nearby, that would resolve the dilemma, Goebel says. But, "I'd presume these were modern humans too," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What can a 45,000-year-old mammoth carcass say about human history?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today