Scientists invent lithium-ion battery that's less likely to explode on you

Researchers at Stanford University used nanotechnology to solve a longstanding problem among electrically-driven devices, from airplanes to so-called hoverboards.

John Bazemore/AP/File
Airline passenger Gary Hammond rides on a so-called hoverboard after claiming his luggage at Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport in December 2015, in Atlanta.

Researchers at Stanford University have created a lithium-ion battery that won’t catch fire, following a rash of incidents involving devices powered by the rechargeable batteries.

The batteries are made to turn off before they can reach temperatures causing them to overheat, according to an announcement made by the university on Monday. The study appeared in the journal Nature Energy.

The invention may mitigate the drumbeat of recalls of products that run on lithium-ion batteries, which are used in an array of electronic contraptions from vehicles and airplanes to computers and so-called hoverboards.

Zhenan Bao, a professor of chemical engineering at Stanford who is part of a team of researchers who worked on the study, said the sensors stop the battery from operating before it can overheat.

"People have tried different strategies to solve the problem of accidental fires in lithium-ion batteries," said Dr. Bao in a Stanford press release. "We've designed the first battery that can be shut down and revived over repeated heating and cooling cycles without compromising performance.”

Bao and her research team used nanotechnology to address the problem of overheating by preventing electrons from flowing to the battery when temperatures rise.

Safety issues have slowed large-scale production of the batteries, the study notes. For years, rechargeable batteries using lithium have been blamed for a series of fires and explosions, but their ability to hold a high amount of energy continues to make them attractive to companies and consumers.

In 2006, Sony recalled millions of lithium-ion batteries after hundreds overheated and several were found to have triggered fires.

The US Federal Aviation Administration temporarily grounded Boeing's new 787 Dreamliners in January 2013 after two of the aircraft caught fire while using the batteries. In December 2015, several large airlines banned so-called hoverboards on planes because of their propensity to catch fire. 

The Stanford University study said the standard lithium-ion battery contains electrodes and electrolytes that carry charged particles between them. When these items are perforated, the battery can overheat, and when temperatures exceed 300 degree Fahrenheit “the electrolyte could catch fire and trigger an explosion.”

In recent years, some improvements have been made with lithium-ion batteries to prevent fires, including the addition of flame-retardants to the electrolyte.

Last year, MIT researchers developed a progressive manufacturing approach for lithium-ion batteries they said would cut costs in half and make them simpler to recycle. Stanford researchers also recently created a smart battery that delivers a warning when a device is overheating. 

"Unfortunately, these techniques are irreversible, so the battery is no longer functional after it overheats," said the study’s co-author Cui, an associate professor of materials science and engineering and of photon science. "Clearly, in spite of the many efforts made thus far, battery safety remains an important concern and requires a new approach."

The new lithium-ion battery is not yet ready for production. 

[Editor's note: The original article incorrectly stated that Boeing had scrapped its 787 fleet. In fact, in January 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration grounded 787s after two battery fire incidents. Additionally, an earlier version of this story contained incorrect information about Tesla Motors' efforts to improve the safety of their cars' batteries.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.