Kepler telescope may be broken but it’s still raking in new planetary finds

The space telescope is still managing to spot an impressive number of exoplanets despite a malfunction.

T Pyle/JPL-Caltech/NASA Ames
The artist's illustration shows NASA's planet-hunting Kepler spacecraft operating in its second-chance K2 mission.
NASA Ames/W. Stenzel
This artist's concept shows some of the most notable small planets NASA’s Kepler space telescope has discovered.

Kepler, the NASA spacecraft that has been surveying the stars for Earth-like planets, is still going strong, despite a malfunction nearly three years ago that affects how the telescope is oriented in space.

NASA announced this week that Kepler has discovered more than 100 alien planets during its second mission run, called K2. According to new definitions, an alien planet must lie in the so-called "habitable zone" of its home star, the region for orbiting that could allow it to host water and possibly life. There are currently 1,000 Kepler-observed planets that have been confirmed to meet this criteria; an additional 4,696 are awaiting to be confirmed.

"Each result from the planet-hunting Kepler mission's treasure trove of data takes us another step closer to answering the question of whether we are alone in the universe," John Grunsfeld, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington, D.C., said in a news release.

Kepler first launched in March 2009, after years of initial research into the question of whether there are, in fact, other planets like ours somewhere out there in the universe.

Kepler spots planets by using a “transit method” that scientists agreed would enable it the greatest chances of success: the telescope looks for the moment when an alien planet crosses the face of its host star during orbit and causes a temporary dip in brightness. It has used this method to spot more than 60,000 stars during its entire K2 run.

In 2013, Kepler’s observational capacities became severely limited when it lost the second of the four wheels that allow it to point at stars with needed accuracy. Fortunately, Kepler’s mission scientists figured out that they could use solar radiation pressure to mimic the stability effects of the missing wheel, and in 2014, Kepler’s K2 mission went live once again.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.