Slimmed-down black hole has one weird trick for losing weight

An unusually light supermassive black hole might have gotten that way because of a merger between two galaxies.

NASA
An image of the galaxy SDSS J1126+2944 taken by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and Chandra X-ray Observatory. The X-ray observations, shown in purple, show the locations of two black holes, which were brought together by a galaxy merger. The arrow points to the black hole 'biggest loser,' which lost most of the weight of the stars that surrounded it; these stars were stripped away by gravitational forces during the merger.

A surprisingly light supermassive black hole may have shed pounds thanks to a galaxy-merger crash diet, astronomers say.

The unusual black hole, one of two found in the midst of a merger between distant galaxies about 1 billion light-years from Earth, has far fewer stars around it than expected, suggesting that powerful gravitational forces have stripped away the excess weight.

"One black hole is starved, and has 500 times fewer stars associated with it than the other black hole," study leader Julie Comerford, an assistant professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, said in a statement. Comerford presented the results at the 227th annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society yesterday (Jan. 5) in Kissimmee, Florida. "The question is why there's such a discrepancy." [Images: Black Holes of the Universe]

At the heart of most if not all galaxies, including the Milky Way, lies a supermassive black hole, a behemoth that weighs millions or billions of times more than the sun. When galaxies collide, the black holes at their centers interact with surrounding stars, gas and dust, as well as with one another.

Most supermassive black holes pack on the pounds with a spherical collection of stars surrounding them. However, Comerford and her colleagues found something strange going on with the galaxy SDSS J1126+2944, which was created by the merger of two smaller galaxies and harbors two black holes. Observations by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and Chandra X-Ray Observatory showed that one black hole contains the anticipated number of stars, while the other is significantly lighter.

It's possible that the extra weight was shed during the merger, when extreme gravitational forces stripped surrounding stars away, study team members said.

However, another possibility is that the lighter black hole isn't actually supermassive after all. Instead, it could be a rarer medium-size black hole, weighing in between 100 and 1 million times as much as the sun. Intermediate black holes are predicted to lie at the center of smaller dwarf galaxies, and are thought to grow eventually into the more familiar supermassive sort. These smaller black holes would be surrounded by fewer stars than their monstrous elders, which could account for the difference.

"Theory predicts that intermediate black holes should exist, but they are difficult to pinpoint because we don't know exactly where to look," study co-author Scott Barrows, also of the University of Colorado Boulder, said in the same statement. "This unusual galaxy may provide a rare glimpse of one of these intermediate-mass black holes."

The research was published recently in the Astrophysical Journal.

Follow Nola Taylor Redd on Twitter @NolaTRedd or Google+. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook orGoogle+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2016 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.