Newborn star shoots 'lightsaber' into space. A cosmic nod to Star Wars?

In what could be the galaxy's reaction to the most highly anticipated film of the year, Hubble beams down images of a light stream that appear to have been inspired by 'Star Wars.'

ESA/Hubble & NASA, D. Padgett (GSFC), T. Megeath (University of Toledo), and B. Reipurth (University of Hawaii)
A cosmic lightsaber.

Could Thursday’s Hubble Space Telescope image, featuring a “double-bladed lightsaber” shooting through a “dark Jedi-like cloak of dust,” be a cosmic nod to the highly anticipated release of “Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens”?

Probably not.

But according to Hubble’s announcement, unabashedly strewn with "Star Wars" references, the stream of light is coming from our own galaxy, 1,350 light-years away.

The telescope, which is operated by NASA and the European Space Agency, shot the image in infrared light, which allowed it to capture a clear picture through the gas and dust obstructing the fledgling star.

The light stream that’s visible, which the Hubble press release likens to Darth Maul’s double-bladed lightsaber from the 1999 Star Wars installment, “The Phantom Menace,” is actually two streams shooting out from opposite ends of a newly formed star, which in the image is hidden in the center by clouds of dust and gas.

The light beam is located in the Orion Complex, which is a part of the Orion constellation, a fertile region for forming stars.

Here, embryonic stars, called protostars, gather disks of gas that have the potential to turn into solar systems like our own. The growing stars, with a “Jabba-like appetite” explains the team behind Hubble, feeds off the gas. When enough gas has been gathered, the star awakens, ejecting jets of gas from its poles. As the jets travel at high speeds in separate directions, the friction heats the gas surrounding the jets to thousands of degrees.

“Their effect on their environment demonstrates the true power of the Dark Side with a blast stronger than one from a fully armed and operational Death Star battle station,” the press release reads.

These interstellar light beams are called Herbig–Haro (HH) objects. The one shown in today’s Hubble image is dubbed HH 24.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.