Just how fast is Greenland melting?

A new study looks at how the amount and structure of Greenland's ice has changed since 1900.

REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File
Droplets of water fall from a melting ice block harvested from Greenland and installed on Place du Pantheon for a project called Ice Watch Paris, in Paris, France, December 3, 2015 as the World Climate Change Conference 2015 (COP21) continues at Le Bourget near the French capital.

A new study tracks how Greenland's ice structure has changed over time, including how the melting rate has accelerated in recent years.

This latest study, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, tracks how Greenland’s ice mass and structure has changed over a 110-year period. This fills in crucial gaps in knowledge about Greenland’s role in sea-level rise, for which little data has existed until now.

“We have observation-based estimates that is new and super important,” Kristian Kjellerup Kjeldsen, the lead author of the study at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, told Scientific American.

The researchers made their observations by tracking the changes in Greenland’s ice structure that had been captured in thousands of black-and-white photos taken before 1990, when energy-balance modeling and empirical modeling became commonly used.

They compared Greenland’s current ice structure to its baseline composition during the "Little Ice Age" that blanketed much of the world with freezing temperatures, glacier formations, and storms between 1560 and 1850.

"One of the unique things about our results – which distinguish them from earlier model studies – is that we not only estimate the total mass loss of the entire ice. But we can actually calculate changes all the way down to regional and local levels and say something about changes for individual outlet glaciers," Dr. Kjeldsen said in a press release.

What the researchers discovered was that ice loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1900 to 2010 has contributed between 10 and 18 percent to global sea-level rise. The scientists also found that melting has accelerated since at least the 1950s.

It is already known that the Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet, thanks to weather-pattern changes that have been induced by climate change and are bringing increasingly warmer air to the Earth’s poles, thus accelerating melting. In the Arctic, melting from both the young surface ice and the older, deeper ice underneath are contributing to worldwide sea level rise.

This latest study not only demonstrates how Greenland has and continues to play a role in global sea-level rise, but it also how its melting rate has changed over time. That’s crucial for bodies like the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which regularly produce reports on climate change.

Previous IPCC reports on climate change did not include residual sea level rise data from the Greenland Ice Sheet before 1990. The researchers believe that their findings will contribute a more precise picture of the science behind global warming to the IPCC's next report.

"We are one step further in mapping out the individual contributions to global sea level rise," Professor Kurt H. Kjær, of the Natural History Museum of Denmark, said in the press release. "In order to predict future sea level changes and have confidence in the projections, it is essential to understand what happened in the past."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Just how fast is Greenland melting?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today