Beijing smog: What makes some cities cleaner than others?

Beijing smog alert: There are many factors that help make cities cleaner, but less coal use and fewer cars on roads are key.

Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters
Vehicles using lights travel on a bridge amid heavy smog after the city issued its first ever 'red alert' for air pollution, in Beijing, China, Tuesday.
Andy Wong/AP
A woman uses a scarf and others wear masks to cover their face from pollutants as they walk along a street on a polluted day in Beijing, Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015. Schools closed and rush-hour roads were much quieter than normal as Beijing’s first-ever red alert for smog took effect Tuesday, closing many factories and invoking restrictions to keep half the city’s vehicles off the roads.

Beijing is in a state of emergency until Thursday as thick, toxic smog blankets the city. Schools have been ordered closed, driving is restricted, and some outdoor activities have been banned as deadly particles suffuse the air above the city.

There are several reasons the city is choking, as The Christian Science Monitor reports. It has a prodigious population of about 20 million people (and growing), more of whom are driving than ever before. And the population uses energy that’s supplied mostly by coal-burning power plants, the dirtiest source of energy in the world.

The city's location in the shadow of high mountains has long been considered good municipal feng shui and a smart way to keep foreign armies at bay, but has proved problematic when it comes to air pollution, trapping dirty air over the city.

But there may be reasons for hope.

Beijing can actually count its dense population as an advantage. Large, crowded cities with good public transportation and a layout conducive to walking and cycling are more efficient and less polluted than large cities without those features, according to urban planners.

This partly explains why cities like New York tend to appear at the top of lists of the most efficient cities when counting greenhouse emissions within its boundaries from cars, chimneys, power plants, and industrial facilities.

“Bigger cities and denser, more compact living patterns offer a double benefit,” explained and urban studies expert Richard Florida in The Atlantic.

“They not only stimulate innovation and leverage productivity,” he goes on, “but also use less energy and generate fewer emissions per person.”

New York uses not only less, but cleaner sources of energy to generate electricity for its more than 8 million residents, including natural gas, nuclear, and hydroelectric.

Emissions are higher in sprawling cities like Houston that require driving and that house energy-intensive industries like oil and gas and manufacturing.

They’re also higher in Los Angeles, which has half the population of New York City, but is built for driving and is surrounded by air-trapping mountains like Beijing.

In fact, as CNN points out, the L.A. of 60 years ago had much in common with Beijing today. The city had the dirtiest air in the world, for the same reasons the Chinese city is choking: an economic boom and a rapid population rise.

"With this followed demands for more power, more jobs, and the rising middle class that did things like buy cars and drive them," the city’s Mayor Eric Garcetti recalled at an event earlier this year, according to CNN.

He said the smog was so bad during World War II, “some thought it was a chemical weapon attack by Japanese forces during the war."

But the federal Clean Air Act first launched in 1963 and the 1970 emission standards for cars helped the city recover its air, though it’s still among the most polluted US cities, according to the American Lung Association.

Chinese officials have promised at the Paris climate talks and before that, to cut its coal use in order to address both air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

“This week in Paris, China is rightfully getting credit for its policies to tackle climate change,” Alex Wang, a law professor at the University of California in Los Angeles, who studies Chinese environmental policy, told the Times.

“But the extraordinary air pollution in Beijing right now demonstrates just how much remains to be done to make these policies work in practice.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.