15 years of the ISS: What's next for manned space stations?

Despite major technological changes and upheavals in international politics, the space station remains a beacon of scientific progress.

NASA/Handout via Reuters
The International Space Station is seen with the docked space shuttle Endeavour in this photo taken by Expedition 27 crew member Paolo Nespoli from the Soyuz TMA-20 following its undocking. It is the first-ever image of a space shuttle docked to the ISS, taken on May 23, 2011. The International Space Station celebrated its 15 year anniversary of human occupancy on November 2.

The International Space Station (ISS) marks its 15th year in space today.

It’s come a long way since its earliest days, when there was no Internet and very little proper ventilation onboard. Budget constraints imposed by the US and Russian governments also forced the early space station to be much smaller than its planners intended.

Over the years, one of the space station’s functions has been to allow international cooperation. After NASA mothballed the Space Shuttle program, which for years ferried astronauts to and from the ISS, Russia stepped in, using Soyuz spacecraft to provide trips for American astronauts.

The ISS "is the blueprint for global cooperation," NASA says. "One that enables a multinational partnership and advances shared goals in space exploration."

Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui agrees with that assessment. “ The Earth will be a much better place,” he told The Associated Press, if nations learn to practice the same philosophy of harmony and cooperation that exists on the space station.   

Funding for the program is in place through 2024, but it is still unclear where mission support will come from after that point.

Eventually, other countries could assemble their own manned space stations, including Russia, NASA's closest partner on the ISS. Russian President Vladimir Putin has made comments regarding the country's intent to build a Russian space station after funding for the International Space Station ends.    

India and China are also starting to catch up as well. Last year, India successfully launched a Mars orbital satellite, and this September the nation successfully launched an orbital space observatory.

Meanwhile, China – which had been barred from participating on the International Space Station since 2011, following a US government policy that forbids the US from working with China on such matters – has been working on building its own space station. Tiangong-1 – the name means “heavenly palace” in Chinese – was launched in 2011, and has remained in orbit since.      

But Bill Shepherd, the commander of the first expedition to the International Space Station, told SPACE.com that he remains optimistic about its future.

"What does [the] Space Station mean in the context of the next century, the next millennium? I think it is very exciting to wonder just how far this will go,” Shepherd said. “I think it is a good road map for bigger things in the future.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.