As climate changes, scientists call for unified, bigger view of tiny microbes

Understanding microbes could be key to better crop production as the available arable land shrinks. But scientists say they need to find better ways to collaborate across borders. 

Hoi-Ying Holman Group/Reuters/File
This undated handout image shows microbes degrading oil in the deepwater plume from the BP oil spill in the Gulf.

To better understand how microbes affect the biosphere, three scientists (from the US, Germany, and China) proposed a Unified Microbiome Initiative (UMI) this week, in an effort to study the microbial community through a more holistic lens.

“Earth’s biome is not defined by national borders, and efforts to unlock its secrets should go global,” argue microbiologists Nicole Dubilier, Margaret McFall-Ngai, and Liping Zhao in Nature in the journal Nature Thursday. Scientists believe a better understanding of microbes will allow us to help key challenges in the 21st century, such as agriculture and environmental sustainability, because we are “only just realizing the full importance of the microbial world.”

So what are microbes?

The Microbiology Society describes them as “very small living organisms, so small that most of them are invisible” and need a microscope to be seen. Scientists believe there are over 2-3 billion different microbe species, and they are divided into six different groups, including bacteria, fungi, algae and viruses. 

“They make up more than 60 percent of the Earth’s living matter,” and they perform essential functions such as “breaking down dead plant and animal matter into simpler substances that are used at the beginning of the food chain,” the Microbiology Society explains.

The scientists behind the UMI, and a corresponding International Microbiome Initiative (IMI), say the world needs better coordination between microbiome researchers. UMI and IMI supporters say there needs to be easier ways to tackle data sharing and property rights between countries because scientists need to work together to advance microbe research.

“This lack of consistency in approaches means that effective comparisons and interpretations of human microbiota studies are often not possible,” but “the study of any micorbiome demands myriad collaborations,” say Dubilier, McFall-Ngai and Zhao. 

The Director of the American Academy of Microbiology Ann Reid even suggested in 2011 that understanding and developing a microbe-plant partnership “could spark a new Green Revolution” that maximizes crop production naturally and efficiently.

Because of a changing climate and shrinking supply of arable land, “we need to develop crop plants that continue to be productive even when growth conditions are poor,” Dr. Reid argues. And if we could better understand the relationships between plants and microbes, we could learn how to make these relationships support further crop growth.

Recent research has shown that enhancement of microcrobial communities in agricultural land can improve drought tolerance of wheat, rice, and other staple crops – that's a promising development in the quest to eliminate hunger in an ever-warming and increasingly populated world.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.