What can a newly discovered lab teach us about Thomas Jefferson?

A newly discovered but well-preserved chemistry lab designed by Thomas Jefferson offers clues about the process and importance of lab science in the early 1800s.

Dan Addison/University of Virginia/AP
This photo from the University of Virginia shows a chemical hearth found in the Rotunda at the University of Virginia during a renovation at the school in Charlottesville, Va.

Workers renovating the University of Virginia Rotunda found a forgotten chemistry lab partly designed by Thomas Jefferson, which provides insight into the teaching of chemistry at the time. 

Jefferson, the university's founder, agreed to the lab because professor John Emmet said the students needed to do their own experiments, not just watch him, the Dispatch Tribunal reported. The nation's third president specified the lab's placement on the ground floor so that water would be easily accessible for experiments because he recognized the unique needs of a science lab, according to a University of Virginia release. 

Mr. Jefferson is of course known as a statesman and writer, but the directives he gave for the lab reveal his concern for the natural sciences, as he specified size and location for the lab.

"For the Professor of Chemistry, such experiments as require the use of furnaces, cannot be exhibited in his ordinary lecturing room," he wrote in an April 1823 letter, according to a University of Virginia news release. "We therefore prepare the rooms under the oval rooms of the ground floor of the Rotunda for furnaces, stoves &c. These rooms are of 1,000 square feet area each."

The lab offers a sense of how chemistry was taught in the early days years of the United States. The main brick hearth would have had two fireboxes, one for wood and one for coal, and was for demonstration purposes by the professor.

"The experiments would be done at the higher level where the stone is almost like a counter top, there may have been an iron plate or grill there," Matt Schiedt, who is managing the project to renovate the University of Virginia Rotunda as part of John G. Waite Associates Architects, told the Charlottesville Newsplex

The students would have used portable hearths for their own experiments, Brian Hogg, historic preservation planner for the University of Virginia, said in a release. Underground brick tunnels supplied the fires with fresh air and allowed fumes to escape. 

"It was during the period where chemistry was beginning to be taught and people were starting to do more experiments," Mr. Schiedt told the Charlottesville Newsplex. "It's very unique because there's certainly documentation that there were chemical hearths like this in other places, especially in Europe, but they are all mostly destroyed."

The university moved students to a new chemistry lab in the 1840s. The lab's brickwork protected it from a fire in 1895 and renovations to the university in the 1970s, the Charlottesville Newsplex reported. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What can a newly discovered lab teach us about Thomas Jefferson?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today