Can oil bosses lose the 'bad guy' image before climate talks?

Oil and gas industry executives gathered in France to discuss climate change.

Jacky Naegelen/Reuters
(L-R) Helge Lund, Chief Executive Officer of BG Group, Claudio Descalzi, CEO of Eni, Emilio Lozoya, Chief Executive Officer of Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex), Bob Dudley, Group Chief Executive of BP, Amin H. Nasser, President and CEO of Saudi Arabian Oil Company Saudi Aramco, Patrick Pouyanne, Chief Executive Officer of Total, Eldar Saetre, CEO of Statoil, Josu Jon Imaz, Chief Executive Officer of Repsol, pose for a family photo before the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative summit in Paris, France, October 16, 2015. Oil and gas industry leaders launch a final charm offensive on Friday to highlight the sector's relevance in the global fight against climate change before a key summit in Paris later this year.

Oil and gas industry bosses pledged on Friday to curb gas flaring as they sought to boost their image in the climate change debate ahead of a United Nations summit later this year, but disagreed on putting a price on carbon emissions.

The leaders of 10 companies that produce 20 percent of the world's oil and gas recognized that current greenhouse gas levels were inconsistent with a goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial times, but stopped short of outlining goals to cut their own emissions.

The executives of eight companies held an unprecedented joint press conference in Paris, calling for an "effective" agreement at the UN summit in December, where negotiators from almost 200 nations will meet to try to forge a global climate change agreement.

While promising to collaborate on limiting gas flaring at refineries, they failed to find common ground on a mechanism for carbon pricing, which leaders of seven European companies adhered to earlier this year, saying it will encourage the private sector to use cleaner sources of energy and to develop new technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS).

"We have international oil companies and national oil companies and some of the nations have a different view on carbon pricing as a group," BP chief executive officer Bob Dudley said.

"We actually think this is the route that will allow us to allocate our capital and make our investments. It isn't written in the report because we wanted to bring a group together committed to many of the other broader goals out there."

Officials who attended the leaders' discussions ahead of the press conference said the heads of the national oil companies of Saudi Aramco and Mexico as well of India's Reliance Industries preferred not to include a reference to carbon pricing.

The rift will amplify an already deep divide between Europe's Total, BP, BG Group, Eni, Statoiland Repsol and their U.S. peers including Exxon Mobil and Chevron who stayed away from the initiative.

Bad guys

For many of the companies, this is a fight for the future of the oil and gas sector in the public debate as a rising number of organizations and politicians call for minimizing the use of fossil fuels in favor of renewable energy such as wind and solar power.

"Sometimes in all these discussions you have the impression that all fossil fuels are the bad guys. But the bad guys are part of the solution," Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanne told a gas and electricity summit in Paris on Thursday.

"Whatever people think, we still need fossil fuels. We need to make advocacy for gas. We need to explain to our policy makers that gas has to be encouraged," Pouyanne said.

"Policy makers are not convinced in many countries that gas is part of the solution for climate change, we in the industry need to speak up."

The executives again urged governments to ditch coal in favor of less polluting natural gas, which emits around half of the CO2 coal does, in power plants and heavy industry.

Pouyanne said that a major Chinese oil and gas company he would not name will join the group by the end of the year.

BG Group's chief executive Helge Lund said that he hoped further companies would join to form a "critical mass to have a more visible position for solving the climate issue."

Diplomats gather in Bonn from Monday for the last formal session ahead of the Paris climate talks in December.

The International Energy Agency forecasts oil will remain the largest energy source by 2040, although its share will decline while renewable sources of energy will grow.

All major emitting countries have now submitted plans to the United Nations detailing how much they plan to curb their emissions.

For oil executives, pledges by key oil consuming countries including China and India to cut fossil fuel consumption have crystallized their need to act.

The World Bank estimates around 300 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted from gas flaring each year, equivalent to around 77 million cars.

Critics say however that without clear goals to cut their emissions, oil companies' efforts would have little impact.

Charlie Kronick of environmental campaign group Greenpeace said: "Their latest intervention contains nothing meaningful that will significantly aid the decarbonisation of the global economy."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can oil bosses lose the 'bad guy' image before climate talks?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today