How the ocean’s frozen methane is being unlocked by climate change

Scientists have examined bubble plumes that suggest subsurface warming is causing once-frozen methane to be released as gas.

Brendan Philip/University of Washington
Sonar image of bubbles rising from the seafloor off the Washington coast.

Scientists from the University of Washington have spotted bubble plumes off the Washington and Oregon coast, suggesting that frozen methane deep in the ocean is thawing.

More importantly, this conversion means it is transforming a “dormant solid to a powerful greenhouse gas,” UW's Hannah Hickey writes in a press release.

What this might mean for climate change is uncertain, the researchers emphasized, though they said local marine life and fisheries will be affected.

Methane is an extremely potent greenhouse gas, with a pound-for-pound impact that is 25 times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period.

Ironically, what appears to be driving the transition is climate change itself. The activity was detected about a third of a mile below the ocean’s surface, which experiences warmer temperatures, researchers said.

The team examined 168 methane plumes over the past decade, concluding that subsurface warming is the cause of the methane’s release. The researchers’ findings are to be published in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

“What we’re seeing is possible confirmation of what we predicted from the water temperatures: Methane hydrate appears to be decomposing and releasing a lot of gas,” H. Paul Johnson, the UW professor of oceanography who led the study, told Ms. Hickey. “If you look systematically, the location on the margin where you’re getting the largest number of methane plumes per square meter, it is right at that critical depth of 500 meters.”

“We see an unusually high number of bubble plumes at the depth where methane hydrate would decompose if seawater has warmed,” said Professor Johnson. “So it is not likely to be just emitted from the sediments; this appears to be coming from the decomposition of methane that has been frozen for thousands of years.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.