Did Kepler telescope really pick up evidence of 'alien megastructures'?

For now, the best guess from researchers is that they have spotted an enormous cloud of comets going around a distant star, but there is a proposal to look deeper.

This artist rendition shows the Kepler space telescope. Kepler is designed to search for Earth-like planets in the Milky Way galaxy.

The scientists are not saying the "peculiar" activity they observed around a distant star is not aliens.

“We’d never seen anything like this star,” says Tabetha Boyajian, a postdoc at Yale in an interview with The Atlantic. “It was really weird. We thought it might be bad data or movement on the spacecraft, but everything checked out.”

For now, the best guess from the group of crowd-sourced space researchers is that they have spotted an enormous cloud of comets going around a distant star, based on four years of data gathered by NASA's Kepler space telescope.

The telescope dutifully captured the same span of deep space from 2009 to 2013, on the lookout for planets like ours. It did this by pointing at more than a hundred thousand stars and watching for dips in brightness. Many factors can contribute to dimming. For instance, a star may appear to give off less light if it has planets orbiting it, because they can cause a detectable difference in brightness when viewed from Earth simply by passing in front of the star. Astronomers can extrapolate on fluctuations in brightness to determine things like the size and speed of the planet.

The majority of data collected by Kepler is run through algorithms that seek for repeating patterns, but a website called Planet Hunters invites citizen scientists to inspect the data "by eye" and try to find anything unusual. It was those volunteers that spotted the unusual star, which has been dubbed KIC 8462852, in what the researchers describe in a paper as a "serendipitous discovery."

The star in question has unusually high variations and frequent intervals of fluctuating brightness.

According to New Scientist, KIC 8462852 is about fifty percent larger than Earth's sun, and hotter and brighter. At 1,500 light-years away it appears too faint to see with the naked eye.

Aided by observations from Earth, the team was able to rule out variability from the star itself or interference from nearby stars, and concluded the star must be covered by "dust clumps" of unknown origins.

Again working through scenarios, the team concluded the most likely explanation is a group of exocomets that came close enough to the star to be broken up by its gravity, creating vast amounts of dust and gas as a result. According to New Scientist, "if the comets are on an eccentric orbit passing in front of the star every 700 days or so, further breaking up and spreading out as they go, that could explain all the dips in the data."

Dr. Boyajian was not satisfied with all the "ifs" in her team's conclusions, and showed the research to Jason Wright, an astronomer from Penn State University who studies exoplanets and has dug into Kepler data for evidence of advanced alien civilizations.

Professor Wright will soon publish his own conclusions of the data Boyajian showed him. Wright and his co-authors say the unusual star’s light pattern is consistent with a “swarm of megastructures,” perhaps stellar-light collectors, technology designed to catch energy from the star, Slate reports.

“When [Boyajian] showed me the data, I was fascinated by how crazy it looked,” Wright told The Atlantic. “Aliens should always be the very last hypothesis you consider, but this looked like something you would expect an alien civilization to build."

That hypothesis is quite the long shot, but any possibility of finding evidence of civilized life is enough to warrant further research.

Kepler stopped working in 2013, so the Planet Hunters team has not been able to keep up with the star as they would like. But that may not matter.

Boyajian is now working with Wright and Andrew Siemion, the Director of the SETI Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley. The new team of three is writing a proposal to point a massive radio dish at the mysterious star, in search of radio waves at frequencies that may only increase the sense of mystery. If activity is detected, what could be out there?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Did Kepler telescope really pick up evidence of 'alien megastructures'?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today