Scientists discover huge tsunami 73,000 years ago. Could it happen again?

The history of an ancient 'megatsunami' off the coast of Africa may highlight our current problems with tsunami prediction.

Ricardo Ramalho
A tsunami generated by a volcanic flank collapse is believed to have swept huge boulders like this one into the highlands of Santiago island. Here, a researcher chisels out a sample for dating.

Waves the size of the Chrysler building may seem like they belong in a movie trailer, but scientists have recently found that megatsunamis are all too real.

Scientists say that 73,000 years ago, a large flank (or slope) from the volcanic island Fogo in the Cape Verde islands off the coast of Africa fell into the ocean and triggered a tsunami that could – quite literally – move mountains.

“You’re displacing a huge mass, which must generate movement of water,” Ricardo Ramalho, the lead researcher behind the study, told The Washington Post. “And in the case of volcanic flank collapses they can be very acute, because you have all the mass collapsing basically into the oceans.”

Scientists knew Fogo experienced a collapse thousands of years ago because a nearby seafloor shows evidence of a huge rock avalanche. They also already expected that this avalanche caused a tsunami 30 miles away on the island of Santiago, but there has been disagreement over just how big it was. Until now, scientists assumed the collapse happened in stages instead of all at once, only triggering several smaller tsunamis. A recent study of the Fogo collapse in 2011 by French scientists suggests that there were multiple waves, registering only 45 feet in height.

So what was Dr. Ramalho’s proof for a megatsunami? Rocks. Really, really big rocks. 

When Ramalho was on Santiago in 2007, he found large boulders on top of a high plateau, near a sheer, vertical cliff. Ramalho and his colleagues were able to trace the boulders’ origin to the cliff below because the rock types “exclusively crop out on the cliff faces and lower slopes of the plateau, implying a source at considerably lower elevations.” As The Christian Science Monitor's Joseph Dussault reports, the scientists found that the boulders were composed of marine rock, whereas the surrounding terrain was made of young volcanic rock.

There seemed to be only one force powerful enough to move these rocks 800 feet above their original location: a megatsunami.

By studying the unique isotopes on rock surfaces, the scientists were able to date the 700-ton rocks back to the same time in history as Fogo’s volcanic collapse. Fossils scattered thousands of feet above sea level also act as proof for one, massive wave, suggesting the megatsunami left marine animals on the high plateau.     

So can we expect another prehistoric catastrophe any time soon?

In their study published in the journal Science Advances Friday, the authors cite precaution as a main reason for their work. The scientists suggest their findings “further demonstrate that flank collapses may indeed catastrophically happen and are capable of triggering tsunamis of enormous height and energy, adding to their hazard potential.”

This recent theory is questioned by other scientists in the field, who doubt that our big volcanoes today could collapse suddenly. “Rather, they envision landslides coming in gradual stages, generating multiple, smaller tsunamis,” the Earth Institute at Columbia University said in a press release.

But either way, its hard to prepare for a tsunami, big or small. Although many of the world's biggest cities are located close to an ocean, scientists still have a hard time predicting when and where tsunamis will hit. Scientists can study fault lines as they do for earthquakes, but it is difficult to project which direction tsunami waves will move.

And although Ramalho believes a similar collapse is possible, he doesn’t want his megatsunami theory to cause a mega-freakout.

“We need to start thinking coolly and rationally, what can be done in terms of disaster risk reduction,” Ramalho told the Monitor. “How may we respond to such a crisis, and what measures can be taken at short, medium and long term to increase our society’s resilience to their threat?”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.