Color-coded fossils: Scientists can now find ancient creatures' true colors

Scientists can now identify the color of ancient animals through structures in fossils.

Anika Vogel/Senckenberg Research Institute/Reuters
A fossil of a bat species known as Palaeochiropteryx found in Messel, Germany is seen in an undated handout picture courtesy of the Senckenberg Research Institute. The fossil is estimated to be about 49 million years old. Scientists have figured out how to know the color of an extinct creature based on microscopic structures in fossils that divulge pigment, and on Monday disclosed for the first time the fur color of extinct mammals: two of the earliest-known bats.

Were prehistoric animals brown, green, blue, or perhaps purple?

Previously, determining the color of an ancient animal was a puzzle for scientists. But in a new study, researchers reveal the color of 50-million-year-old bats, using just their fossils. 

Thanks to microscopic structures in the fossils, scientists determined that these ancient bats were reddish-brown, according to a study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This might not be a surprising color for a bat, as they match the night-fliers seen today. But an animal’s pigment doesn’t have to be spectacular or shocking to tell a bigger tale.

"Biologists know a lot about living animals because of color: what sort of environment they live in, how they protect themselves or how they attract mates," study author and Virginia Tech paleobiologist Caitlin Colleary told Reuters.

"But since so little is preserved in the fossil record, the color of extinct animals has always been left up to artists' interpretations, and important information regarding behavior has been considered inaccessible,” Ms. Colleary said.

Melanin, the pigment that gives skin, hair, feathers, and eyes distinctive hues, was also the key for ancient animal coloring. 

Scientists spotted tiny structures in the fossils that reminded them of melanosomes, the organelles in cells that contain melanin.

"Very importantly, we see that the different melanins are found in organelles of different shapes: reddish melanosomes are shaped like little meatballs, while black melanosomes are shaped like sausages," said Jakob Vinther, study author and molecular paleobiologist at the University of Bristol in a university release. “We can see that this trend is also present in the fossils.”

"This means that the correlation of melanin colour to shape is an ancient invention, which we can use to easily determine colour from fossils by simply looking at the melanosome shape," Dr. Vinther said.

There had been some debate in the scientific community about whether the structures in the fossils were actually melanosomes, or were simply fossilized bacteria. This new study answers that question. The research team found chemical evidence of melanin, confirming the structures as melanosomes.

"This is a great leap forward in our understanding of how fossils are preserved. We now know how melanin is preserved and we have the methods to confidently detect it,” said Vinther in the release. 

Although this chemical examination is new, this isn’t the first time scientists used these techniques. As Reuters reported:

Vinther also has used the method to study colors in dinosaurs, fish, amphibians and fossil squid ink. The method was first described in 2008 regarding a 105-million-year-old black-and-white striped feather from Brazil and also showed that a winged dinosaur from China, Microraptor, boasted iridescent feathers.

And more can be learned from this pigment.

"We have now studied tissues from fish, frogs, and tadpoles, hair from mammals, feathers from birds, and ink from octopus and squids. They all preserve melanin, so it's safe to say that melanin is all over the place," Colleary said in the  release. "Now we can confidently fill in some of the original colour patterns of these ancient animals."

The bats in this study, Palaeochiropteryx and Hassianycteris, roamed the Earth in the Eocene Epoch, 56 to 33.9 million years ago. These specimens roosted in a tropical forest beside a lake in what is now Germany. 

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.