What do fish scales have to do with tooth enamel? More than you would think.

A team of researchers from Sweden and China discovered that our teeth enamel originated from the scales of ancient fish.

Ng Han Guan/AP
A girl learns how to clean teeth at the Science and Technology Museum in Beijing, China, Dec. 22, 2009. Fossil and genetic evidence suggests that the enamel that coats human teeth evolved from fish scales, according to a paper published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Who knew our teeth were so fishy?

Apparently, the enamel that covers our teeth originated from the scales of ancient fish that lived more than 400 million years ago, scientists say.

Enamel – white, shiny, and resilient to cavity – is the hardest tissue our bodies can produce, and it isn’t just found in teeth. While most vertebrates have enamel teeth, some have enamel scales. Sharks, for instance, have "dermal denticles” or little tooth-like scales on their skin to help them swim faster.

To researchers, this posed the question: Which came first, teeth enamel or skin enamel? In July, researchers from Uppsala University in Sweden and the Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology (IVPP) in Beijing used data from both palaeontology and genomics to determine that enamel was first part of the skin and colonized the teeth much later.

"This is important because it is unexpected," paleontologist Per Erik Ahlberg of University of Uppsala told Tech Times. "In us, enamel is only found on teeth, and it is very important for their function, so it is natural to assume that it evolved there."

Professor Ahlberg is one of four authors in a collaborative study published Wednesday in the journal Nature. The first component of the study looked at the bony fish gar (Lepisosteus) from North America, whose scales were covered with not enamel but an enamel-like tissue called "ganoine."

Tatjana Haitina, a researcher of organismal biology at Uppsala University, investigated the genome of Lepisosteus discovered that it contains genes for two out of humans’ three enamel matrix proteins.

Ahlberg, along with his colleagues Qingming Qu and Min Zhu from IVPP, studied two other fossil fishes – Psarolepis from China and Andreolepis from Sweden, both of which are more than 400 million years old. They found that the Psarolepis had enamel-covered scales and face denticles but none on the teeth; the Andreolepis only had scales that carried enamel. This suggests that enamel came first from outside of the body before growing on teeth.

Courtesy of Qingming Qu and Min Zhu/Reuters
An undated illustration shows the Early Devonian bony fish called Psarolepis romeri found in south China. Scientists said on Wednesday that fossil and genetic evidence indicates enamel did not originate in the teeth but in the scales of ancient fish that lived more than 400 million years ago, and only later became a key component in teeth. The two fossil pieces, one of the dermal skull (top l.) and the other of a lower jaw, are bearing teeth. However, these teeth lack enamel, unlike our teeth, according to new research published in the journal Nature. This fish is a key piece of evidence showing that enamel did not evolve together with vertebrate teeth, but appeared much later in more derived bony fishes, according to researchers.

“Together, the positive molecular identification of ganoine as enamel and the recognition of restricted enamel distribution in Andreolepis and Psarolepis provide important evidence for the evolution of [enamel],” the authors write in the study.

According to an Uppsala University press release, the study is the first tissue evolution analysis to combine both palaeontological and genomic data. The research group will continue exploring the origin of vertebrate tissues using this approach.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What do fish scales have to do with tooth enamel? More than you would think.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0924/What-do-fish-scales-have-to-do-with-tooth-enamel-More-than-you-would-think
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe