Sneak peek: ‘The Martian’ premieres on space station

NASA screened 'The Martian' aboard the International Space Station over the weekend, as part of an effort to generate interest around the agency's space program.

NASA via AP/File
Astronauts Scott Kelly, left, and Kjell Lindgren, aboard the International Space Station, speak to actors from the movie 'The Martian' in this Sept. 15 image made from video provided by NASA. The astronauts were treated to a screening of the film over the weekend.

“The Martian” doesn’t hit theaters on Earth until October, but the upcoming film has already made its premiere – in space.

Astronauts aboard the International Space Station were treated over the weekend to a special screening of the film, based on a novel by Andy Weir, about a man stranded on Mars and his colleagues’ efforts to bring him home. The screening was part of a push by NASA to link the science and strategy portrayed in the movie, which is set in the near future, with real life projects underway in Houston.

"It really highlights a lot of things that we work on," Ellen Ochoa, director of the Johnson Space Center and a former astronaut, said of the technology portrayed in the film. Among them: how to devise ways to safely land objects on the surface of Mars and create a closed-loop life support system.

Indeed, preparations for a manned mission to Mars by the 2030s are proceeding as planned, NASA says. These include development of the Orion capsule and the Space Launch System (SLS) megarocket – which are scheduled for their first joint, unmanned test flight in 2018 – to help get astronauts to destinations in deep-space, Space.com reports

Astronauts on the ISS have also experimented on the production of food crops away from Earth, growing and eating lettuce raised on the space station. In addition, NASA astronaut Scott Kelly and cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko are on a year-long mission to characterize the psychological and physiological effects of long-duration spaceflight – critical to the Mars missions, which could keep astronauts away from Earth for 500 days or more.

"We are farther down the path to sending humans to Mars than at any point in NASA's history," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, a former space shuttle commander, told reporters last week.

That doesn’t mean we’re ready for a trip to the Red Planet just yet, however. Even Mr. Weir’s novel, lauded for its its scientific details and imagined ways a stranded astronaut might grow food on the Martian surface, is still only "one version" of what a manned mission to the Red Planet could look like, officials said – and there are parts of Weir's story that remain closer to science fiction than fact.

“The reality is even if all those technologies were ready, if they were magically ready tomorrow, we would be a no-go for launch," Camille Alleyne, an assistant program scientist working on the International Space Station Program, told the Associated Press. "Because the human body is not yet ready for us to go to Mars."

Budget is also an issue: “For a Mars mission, [NASA] would need an estimated $80 to $100 billion over the next 20 years, which Congress so far has refused to authorize,” Wired reports.

The agency is hoping “The Martian” – like “Apollo 13” and “2001: A Space Odyssey” before it – will generate renewed interest in its space programs.

“NASA really likes the book,” Weir told Wired. “They see it as an opportunity to reengage the public with space travel.”

"It helps the public feel the excitement that we feel," astronaut Rex Walheim, who flew the final space shuttle mission, and is chief of the Exploration Branch of the Astronaut Office, told the AP. "For two hours they get to sit in a theater and see the excitement of space flight. But this is something that we get to live."

The Martian,” which stars Matt Damon and is directed by Ridley Scott, opens in theaters Oct. 2.

This report contains material from The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.