Climate change: Biggest threat to plants may be competition, not heat

As rising temperatures change the face of the planet, a new study investigates what will happen to species interactions.

Rich Pedroncelli/AP/File
Gino Celli, who relies on senior water rights to water his crops, inspects a wheat field nearing harvest on his farm near Stockton, Calif., May 18, 2015.

What happens to existing plants when a new species, forced out of its former habitat by rising temperatures, invades their territory?

Mountaintop plants, for example, now face competition from flowers and shrubs that previously grew at lower elevations but have begun migrating uphill as temperatures rise – and that makes all the difference, according to a study in the latest issue of Nature.

"Finding out that it is competition from lower-elevation flora that serves as the decisive effect, and not higher temperatures as previously assumed, is a very valuable discovery," said plant ecologist Jake Alexander, lead author of the study, in a press release.

An experiment in the Alps revealed that mountain plants can survive an increase of 3 degrees, as long as they are only competing with their current alpine neighbors. When lower-elevation plants move in, however – what the researchers call "novel competitors" – their survival rate declines dramatically. Even those that hold up against the competition grow poorly and produce fewer flowers, say the researchers.

"This is important because it shows that we need to know who plants are competing against if we want to predict their performance and location after climate warming," said Dr. Alexander.

Alexander partnered with Jeff Diez and Jonathan Levine to empirically test the role of "novel competitors" in the field. In most habitats, scientists do not know which species will invade next. "But in mountains we do," explained Dr. Levine. "[T]he future competitors of alpine plants are only hundreds of meters down the slope."

To conduct the experiment, the authors transplanted four plant species from their current location in an alpine meadow to a new home about half a mile downhill.

This move simultaneously created the expected rise of about 3 degrees in average temperature for Switzerland over the next 50 to 100 years and gave the plants new neighbors, based on their expected or current competitors. The researchers also transplanted some plant species to higher elevations and examined the effects of that migration on the surrounding ecology.

The migration of these "novel competitors ... generally exceeded the impact of warming," the authors write.

In other words, the climb of lower-elevation plants to higher altitudes, not merely temperature increase, will be the deciding factor in landscapes transformed by climate change.

Why?

It's all about access to sunlight, the researchers explain. Higher up on the mountains, lower-elevation plants can grow taller and with broader leaves, thereby shading the smaller species and starving them of the light they need for photosynthesis.

Climate change’s impact is not limited to plants, of course, but the Union of Concerned Scientists predicts that animals will have an easier time migrating than plants. While some tree species, such as the black spruce, are already beginning to move into friendlier terrain, the US Forest Service reports that the migration rate for most trees and other plants under modern climate change will be half of that experienced during the last post-glacial period, because of the fragmentation of forest cover that has occurred since then.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.