Prehistoric 'cow' may have been the first to walk on all fours

An analysis of the 260-million year old fossils show that it stood upright, much like a cow or a hippo, and was the earliest known creature to do so.

Courtesy of Morgan Turner/Brown University
About the same size as a cow, this pre-reptile, Bunostegos akokaensis, also stood the same way — upright with its legs underneath. It may be the earliest known creature to do so, according to a new study.

This week, a new study, published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, reveals that a pre-reptile, known as Bunostegos akokanensis, may have stood upright on all fours. The findings suggest that the creature, approximately 260 million years old, could be the earliest known animal to have done so.

Previous estimates placed the earliest evolution of walking creatures at 210 million years ago, with the 2000 discovery of the two-legged Eudibamus lizard.

The creature, which according to projections resembled a pit bull or perhaps a small cow, belongs to the pareiasaur group. These were herbivores that lived during the Permian Period nearly 300 million years ago, and included species such as the Dimetrodon, which had a lizard-like body and a "sail" fin on its back, or the Lystrosaurus, a herbivore with tusks. Among these counterparts, the Bunostegos akokanensis would have fit right in.

“Imagine a cow-sized, plant-eating reptile with a knobby skull and bony armor down its back,” said co-author Linda Tsuji, of the Royal Ontario Museum. She and her co-authors discovered the fossils in Niger with a team of paleontologists in 2003 and 2006.

During the Permian, the last geological era of the larger Paleozoic, many animals had upright or semi-upright hind limb posture - a bone structure also seen in some modern lizards. Initial research seemed to indicate that the Bunostegos would also have short and wide-spread forearms, yet examination of its forelimbs yielded an entirely different conclusion: The animal stood differently from its counterparts. It had legs which were entirely beneath its body.

"A lot of the animals that lived around the time had a similar upright or semi-upright hind limb posture, but what's interesting and special about Bunostegos is the forelimb, in that its anatomy is sprawling-precluding and seemingly directed underneath its body – unlike anything else at the time," said lead author Morgan Turner in a statement. She was involved with analyzing the creature's bones while studying at the University of Washington, and is now a graduate student at Brown University.

Other evidence appears to suggest that because of the Permian’s geography, the Bunostegos lived largely by itself in an extremely arid habitat.

“Bunostegos was an isolated pareiasaur [large herbivore],” Turner said.

Its long limbs enabled it to trek for long distances in search of food and water, say researchers, and would have been possibly more effective than a sprawling posture, in which the forelimbs do not match up directly underneath the shoulders. The Permian was much drier than previous geological eras due to rainforest collapse, and the supercontinent of Pangea, Bunostegos’ home, would have been dominated by extremes in temperature fluctuation. Over time, plants became more drought-resistant, and some reptiles adapted by becoming more warm-blooded.

“Posture, from sprawling to upright, is not black or white, but instead is a gradient of forms,” Turner said. “There are many complexities about the evolution of posture and locomotion we are working to better understand every day. The anatomy of Bunostegos is unexpected, illuminating, and tells us we still have much to learn.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.