Why NASA is pushing back Orion first manned spaceflight

Astronauts will get their first spin in the new deep-space capsule by the spring of 2023, two years later than previously anticipated, NASA announced Wednesday.

Radislav Sinyak/NASA/AP
Lockheed Martin engineers at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, La., perform the first weld on the Orion spacecraft pressure vessel for Exploration Mission-1, Sept. 5. This is the third Orion pressure vessel built. On Wednesday, top NASA officials said there isn't much confidence in the original 2021 launch date. That's because of the space agency's history of running into unexpected problems in new programs, like Orion. Managers set 2023 as the new official launch date, although they said they haven’t given up yet on 2021.

Facing a series of budget problems and design issues, NASA is delaying the first manned test flight of its deep-space Orion capsule by two years, from the summer of 2021 to as late as the spring of 2023, agency officials said Wednesday.

The capsule and its heavy-lift launcher would be the first manned spacecraft to venture into deep space beyond the moon, eventually leading to what NASA hopes will be a crew landing on Mars by the early 2030s.

Orion is already a multibillion dollar project, but NASA plans to spend another $6.77 billion between 2015 and 2023 producing two new capsules, with the first crewed test flight now scheduled for April of 2023.

“Our work to send humans out into the solar system is progressing,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, in a statement released by the agency. “Orion is a key piece of the flexible architecture that will enable humanity to set foot on the Red Planet, and we are committed to building the spacecraft and other elements necessary to make this a reality.”

But management, technical, and budgetary hurdles have forced several delays in the agency’s plan to eventually send humans into deep space.

Before the first manned flight, the agency is also working toward launching an unmanned Orion capsule in December 2018, which will be carried by a Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.

The SLS rocket, which is costing the agency $7 billion, was previously scheduled for launch in November 2017, but NASA announced that it would be delayed last year.That capsule would first fly in a lunar orbit, followed by a mission where it will rendezvous with a boulder selected robotically from the surface of an asteroid and positioned in orbit farther from the moon.

The agency is currently conducting a technical review to determine whether the Orion capsules will be able to meet the April 2023 launch date, though the agency says its engineers will also work toward the possibility of launching the manned flight earlier if possible. 

NASA has not released any further cost estimates beyond the first Orion test flight, a Government Accountability Office report found in July, but the agency says it is committed to a long-term investment in deep-space exploration.

"We're really trying to build a program," William Gerstenmaier, NASA associate administrator for human exploration and operations, told the Associated Press. "Ultimately, we'd like to get where we're flying these missions about once per year."

This report incorporates material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why NASA is pushing back Orion first manned spaceflight
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today