Federal judge to Navy: Save the whales (at least in the Pacific)

Conservationist say the agreement can 'point the way forward' to safer oceans for whales, dolphins, seals, and other marine mammals. 

Richard Vogel/AP
This Oct. 15, 2014 photo shows dolphins swimming along the side of a boat off the coast of San Pedro, Calif. The Navy agreed to limit its use of sonar and other training that inadvertently harms whales, dolphins and other marine mammals off Hawaii and Calif. in a settlement with environmental groups approved Monday Sept. 14, 2015. A centerpiece of the agreement signed by a federal judge in Honolulu includes limits or bans on mid-frequency active sonar and explosives in specified areas around the Hawaiian Islands and Southern California, Earthjustice attorney David Henkin said.

The US Navy is under orders to save the whales – at least the ones near Hawaii and California, where explosives testing and military sonar have proven harmful to whales and dolphins.

A settlement signed by Judge Susan Oki Mollway in Honolulu on Monday brought to an end a nearly three-year-long legal battle between the Navy and conservation groups, led by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The key provision limits or bans sonar use and explosives in specified areas around the Hawaiian Islands and Southern California, said Earthjustice attorney David Henkin, who represented the plaintiffs, to the Associated Press. "By establishing some safe havens," he said, "the hope is to bring down those estimated numbers of injury and death."

Sonar can disrupt feeding and communication of marine mammals, and it can cause deafness or even death at close range, Mr. Henkin said. Four dolphins died in 2011 when they got too close to an explosives training exercise off the coast of San Diego.

The agreement follows a March ruling that found the Department of Commerce's National Marine Fisheries Services at fault for improperly permitting the Navy to conduct training and testing exercises "even if they end up harming a stunning number of marine mammals, some of which are endangered or threatened," the decision stated.  

District Court Judge Mollway, who also ruled on that case, said in her opinion that looking through "reams of pages for some explanation as to why the Navy’s activities were authorized by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), this court feels like the sailor in Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s 'The Rime of the Ancient Mariner' who, trapped for days on a ship becalmed in the middle of the ocean, laments, 'Water, water, every where, Nor any drop to drink.' "

For decades, conservationists have fought against the use of sonar in areas frequented by large marine mammals. They cite threats to migration and communication patterns, feeding locations, and breeding.

The Navy estimates sailors could inadvertently kill 155 whales and dolphins and injure another 2,000 off Hawaii and Southern California, mostly with explosives. On the Atlantic coast, planned naval activities could cause more than 11,000 serious injuries to the marine mammals.

Lt. Cmdr. Matt Knight, a US Pacific Fleet spokesman, said the settlement preserves key testing and training.

"Recognizing our environmental responsibilities, the Navy has been, and will continue to be, good environmental stewards as we prepare for and conduct missions in support of our national security," Knight said.

Under the agreement, the Navy cannot use sonar in the Southern California habitat for beaked whales between Santa Catalina Island and San Nicolas Island. Sonar also is banned in blue whale feeding areas near San Diego, according to environmental groups involved in the case.

In Hawaiian waters, the agreement forbids sonar and explosives training on the eastern side of the Big Island and north of Molokai and Maui, and caps the number of major training exercises in the channel between Maui and the Big Island. The agreement will protect Hawaiian monk seals and small populations of toothed whales, including the endangered false killer whale.

The deal also places the National Marine Fisheries Service on call to swiftly review any charges of misuse of Navy sonar, Henkin said.

"This settlement proves what we've been saying all along," said Marsha Green, president of the Ocean Mammal Institute, in a statement. "The Navy can meet its training and testing needs and, at the same time, provide significant protections to whales and dolphins by limiting the use of sonar and explosives in vital habitat."

Michael Jansy, director of marine mammal conservation for the group that led the settlement, pointed out the limitations of the ruling.

"The case at issue only pertains to naval activity in waters off Southern California and Hawaii; elsewhere, whales and other marine mammals still remain highly vulnerable to the effects of high-intensity sonar and underwater detonations," Mr. Jansy wrote. "The agreement covers US Navy activities only through the close of 2018 ... yet, as a model, the remedies detailed in the language of the settlement point the way forward."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Federal judge to Navy: Save the whales (at least in the Pacific)
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today