Did dinosaurs walk together on this beach? Amazing footprints yield clues.

Footprints from two carnivorous dinosaurs on a German beach could indicate social behavior, say scientists.

Pernille Venø Troelsen
A footprint, thought to belong to a species of megalosauripus, a type of meat-eating theropod dinosaur. The false color scale shows show far the footprint goes down.
Pernille Venø Troelsen
A statue of megalosauripus.
Pernille Venø Troelsen
An illustration of the dinosaur tracks walking in a southeastern direction. The big dino left the T3 tracks and the small one walked along the T2 tracks.

About 142 million years ago, two carnivorous dinosaurs wandered along a beach and left their large footprints behind in the sand, a new study finds.

These footprints, now fossilized, are helping researchers understand what types of dinosaurs lived in what is now modern-day northern Germany. The tracks show that one dinosaur was large, and the other small. Their prints suggest they walked at a slow, strolling pace — about 3.9 mph (6.3 km/hour) for the large one and about 6 mph (9.7 km/h) for the little one.

At some points, the small dinosaur began trotting, possibly to keep pace with the large one. The footprints also indicate the dinosaurs skid here and there, likely slipping on the wet sand, said study researcher Pernille Troelsen, who earned her master's degree in biology from the University of Southern Denmark in June. [Paleo-Art: Dinosaurs Come to Life in Stunning Illustrations]

The dinosaurs' leisurely paces are slow, given that scientists estimate carnivorous dinosaurs could run faster than about 25 mph (40 km/h), Troelsen said.

Fancy footprints

For the past 200 years, researchers have flocked to Germany's Bückeberg Formation to study fossilized dinosaur footprints and tracks. Many are found in the formation's fine-grained quartz sandstones, but Troelsen chose to study the two tracks — about 50 footprints in all — preserved in a silty mudstone layer.

Her biology background gave her a different perspective from that of geologists, who have also studied the two trackways, she said.

"As a biologist, I can contribute with knowledge about behavior of the individual animals," Troelsen said in a statement.

She started by analyzing the footprints. The large dinosaur's feet measured an average of 13.5 by 14.3 inches (34.4 by 36.4 centimeters) — larger than a U.S. man's size 15 shoe — and the small theropod's prints measured an average of 9.3 by 9.3 inches (23.5 by 23.5 cm), or about a U.S. man's size 6 shoe, Troelsen told Live Science in an email.

Further analysis suggests the animals stood about 5.2 feet (1.6 meters) and 3.6 feet (1.1 m) at hip height, for the large and small dinosaur, respectively, and were likely a species of meat-eating dinosaur within theMegalosauripus genus.They were about the same size as Velociraptor, and were agile hunters that walked and ran on two legs, she said.

Sometimes, the little dinosaur crossed its legs as it walked along the beach, though it's unclear why. Troelsen floated several ideas; perhaps the little theropod lost its balance because the sand was slippery or a gust of wind blew it aside. Or, maybe it found some interesting prey, or wanted to keep up with the big carnivore, she said.

"If so, this may illustrate two social animals, perhaps a parent and a young," Troelsen said in the statement.

Other studies suggest that several dinosaur species were social animals, and possibly hunted together and had dinosaur "daycares" in which adults cared for young together.

But it's impossible to tell whether these tracks were made at the same time.

"They may be many years apart, in which case it maybe reflects two animals randomly crossing each other's tracks," Troelsen said. "We can also see that a duckbill dinosaur (Iguanodon) has crossed their tracks at one time or another, so there has been some traffic in the area."

Researchers have found dinosaur footprints in a number of European countries, including England, northern Germany and Spain, most of them dated to the Lower Cretaceous period, from about 140 million to 145 million years ago, she said.

The findings have yet to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and were presented at the annual meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists in Opole, Poland, on July 10.

Follow Laura Geggel on Twitter @LauraGeggel. Follow Live Science @livescienceFacebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.