Can we colonize the moon?

A report commissioned by NASA outlines the resources needed to put humans, and industry, on the moon. 

Gene Blevins/Reuters
The moon sets through thick smoke at the North Fire near the Phelan, California July 17, 2015.

Could the United States afford a permanent settlement on the Moon? According to a study commissioned by NASA, the answer is yes, if we're willing to go commercial. 

The Space Frontier Foundation found that a lunar colony is feasible if America is willing to harvest the moon’s natural resources for profit, and to invest upwards of $40 billion. But both the price tag and the mission are, of course, complicated.

The study concluded that “America could lead the development of a permanent industrial base on the Moon of 4 private-sector astronauts in about 10-12 years,” emphasizing the use of public-private partnerships, much like the ones being used today to get cargo up to the International Space Station (ISS) through partnerships with companies like SpaceX and Orbital ATK.

NASA concluded in a study that such a partnership saved taxpayers and the cash-strapped agency nearly 90 percent of what it would have cost if a similar mission to the ISS depended solely on NASA. The Space Frontier Foundation says such a model, which allows the private sector to innovate, attract investors, put commercial practices to use, and bring ideas to bear without government oversight, would be integral to the success of a moon mission of this kind.

But first, robots have to find lunar water.

Harvesting the vast amounts of water on the Moon – the equivalent of the Great Salt Lake in Utah – could make the project commercially viable. The oxygen and hydrogen that may be found in lunar craters at the Moon’s poles could provide the ingredients needed to fuel robotic systems, air for people to breathe, water to drink, and the propellant necessary for takeoff and landings on the Moon’s surface.

"This will be a complex operation requiring a period of growth, trial and error, failure, repair, and maintenance as the process matures in operations and procedures," the report states.

The hunt for lunar ice, as the report puts it, is like ‘prospecting for gold,’ and presents the biggest risk to the proposed mission. If robots are unsuccessful in locating the  ice, the mission would have to be amended or even canceled. This would all happen before humans even made a return to the Moon, which the researchers suggest wouldn't happen until the final phase, once robots have prospected and built the infrastructure needed to allow for human habitation. 

The potential for creating a lunar fuel station also brings a manned mission to Mars within NASA's grasp.

As Space Frontier Foundation's Chairman Jeff Feige put it to Discovery, "This is the way that America will settle the final frontier, save taxpayers money, and usher in a new era of economic growth and STEM innovation."

Follow CSMonitor's board Astronomy on Pinterest.
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.