Applause from 3 billion miles away as NASA waits for New Horizons to phone home

The New Horizons spacecraft cemented its place in space-exploration history Tuesday – scientists think. The first hard evidence that the craft survived its flyby of Pluto won't come until shortly after 9 p.m.

The New Horizons spacecraft cemented its place in space-exploration history Tuesday, flitting past Pluto – a dwarf planet with a big heart – and its largest moon Charon in what the mission's lead scientist, Alan Stern, terms "the anchor leg of the initial reconnaissance of the solar system."

Tuesday's historic flyby comes 50 years to the day after Mariner 4 performed NASA's first flyby of Mars, in 1965.

At the moment New Horizons was expected to make its closest approach, some 3 billion miles away an overflow crowd packed into an auditorium and an adjoining tent at the The Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory erupted in applause.

Nearly 1,000 people has gathered to celebrate the achievement – people who had worked on the mission, relatives, as well as relatives of Clyde Tombaugh, the astronomer who in 1930 discovered Pluto, and Gerard Kuiper, for whom Pluto's distant birthplace, the Kuiper Belt, is named.

In a sense, the applause was at least as much about hope and expectation than about an actual achievement. The first hard evidence that the craft survived its flyby won't come until shortly after 9 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time tonight, when it phones home for the first time since late Monday night.

The craft – the size of a baby grand piano and topped with a dish antenna for communicating with the ground – stopped communications at 11:17 EDT Monday night, as planned, to focus on gathering data.

After that, "there was absolutely nothing anyone on the operations team could do but to trust that we had prepared it well to set off on its journey on its own and do what it needed to do," said Alice Bowman, the mission's operations manager.

"I am feeling a little bit nervous," she acknowledged during a post-flyby briefing Tuesday morning. But she added that she has absolute confidence that the craft will perform as designed and that at the appropriate time, it will turn its antenna toward Earth and phone home.

Some two hours before closest-approach time, the science team rose in a standing ovation of its own as researchers got their first glimpse of the final pre-flyby image of Pluto, which arrived overnight – with the planet's heart-shaped region, seen in previous images but with less detail, in full view.

Based on a quick look at the image, the team sees a history of impacts, Dr. Stern said. Researchers also see a history of surface activity that could point to something akin to Earth's plate tectonics. This would indicate that Pluto had – and still may have – an active interior.

But a detailed interpretation awaits the details, including color data, captured during closest approach, he says.

Pluto and Charon actually form a binary planet system, and new images of Charon show that the two objects display strikingly different features. The first evidence of those differences emerged from images of the two taken from Earth.

With New Horizons, "now we can see how dramatically different they are," Stern said.

In addition to a mysterious dark patch at Charon's north pole, its surface appears to host craters and deep chasms.

Pluto appears to host a younger surface, while Charon's is an older, more battered surface, he explained. Using crater counts, the team hopes to provide relative ages for different surfaces on each object.

As for Pluto's younger looking "skin," signs of an old surface either could mean that Pluto still has an internal source of heat that can drive fresh material from depth up to repave the surface. Or weather-related processes could mask evidence of older surfaces.

[Editor's note: This article has been updated to clarify the significance of Tuesday's flyby as it compares with that of Mars.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.