Are you ready to share the road with a self-piloting big rig?

Nevada issued the first license to an autonomous big rig, Daimler's Freightliner Inspiration. Can we really trust a computer to operate a huge truck? 

Daimler Trucks North America LLC/PRNewsFoto
On Tuesday in Nevada, Daimler's Freightliner Inspiration truck became the first licensed autonomous commercial truck to drive on a US public highway.

Drive on a Nevada highway, and you might see something you've never seen before outside of the movies: A giant robot truck.

At a ceremony at the Hoover Dam on Tuesday, Nevada governor Brian Sandoval granted a license to Daimler's Freightliner Inspiration big rig truck, officially making it, in Daimler's words, "the first licensed autonomous driving truck in the US"

Unlike, say, Optimus Prime, this truck is not entirely autonomous. Instead, Daimler calls it "collaborative vehicle system," in which a licensed truck driver plays a key role. 

Here's how it works, according to a Daimler press release:

As soon as the Freightliner Inspiration Truck is safely on the highway, the driver can activate the Highway Pilot system. The driver receives a visual prompt in the instrument cluster to activate the "Highway Pilot." The vehicle switches to autonomous mode and adapts to the speed of traffic. The driver receives a confirmation message in the instrument cluster, "Highway Pilot active."

The Highway Pilot system uses a complex stereo camera and radar systems with lane-keeping and collision-prevention functions. It regulates the speed, applies the brakes and steers. This combination of systems creates an autonomous vehicle that can operate safely under a wide range of driving conditions – the truck automatically complies with posted speed limits, regu­lates the distance from the vehicle ahead or uses the stop-and-go function during rush hour.

The truck won't pass or change lanes on its own, and the driver will need to take control upon leaving the highway. Additionally, if the truck's software encounters something it cannot handle, such as bad weather or road construction, it will alert the driver to take the wheel.

"The autonomous vehicle technology we are showcasing in the Freightliner Inspiration Truck will help reduce accidents, improve fuel consumption, cut highway congestion, and safeguard the environment," said Daimler's Wolfgang Bernhard, who took the truck's first drive, with Gov. Sandoval in the passenger seat.

According to a 2014 report from the RAND Corporation, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration suggests five gradations of vehicle autonomy

• Level 0: The human driver is in complete control of all functions of the car.

• Level 1: One function is automated.

• Level 2: More than one function is automated at the same time (e.g., steering and acceleration), but the driver must remain constantly attentive.

• Level 3: The driving functions are sufficiently automated that the driver can safely engage in other activities.

• Level 4: The car can drive itself without a human driver. 

Daimler classifies its new big rig as a Level 3 autonomous vehicle: If something goes wrong, there is a human driver to fall back on.

There are some Level 2 or Level 3 vehicles on the market already. Mercedes-Benz and Infiniti already include lane-keeping features. Tesla is planning for next year’s Model S sedan to be able to take over some highway driving, and Cadillac will introduce a similar “Super Cruise” feature, according to published reportsSubaru and Volvo both have automated collision warning features.

But how much safety does the human element add? Most experts agree that humans tend to overrate their ability to drive safely. One notable study 1980 found that 88 percent of US drivers rated themselves as safer-than-average, compared with 77 percent of Swedes.

“It’s always the other person who’s the bad driver,” says C. Gregory Russell who’s been an accident investigator for the Trident Engineering of Annapolis, Maryland, for 25 years, in an interview. “Trust me, I’ve seen people do some really screwy things and manage to wreck things and do stuff that you wouldn’t believe they could do.”

"It just seems to be human nature,” he says.

John Ulczycki, vice president of the National Safety Council in Itasca, Illinois, seems to share Mr. Russell's disenchantment with people's driving skills. He has ridden in a (Level 4) Google car, and says  in an interview, “it is by far the safest driver I have ever ridden with.”

“Ninety percent of the crashes today are caused by human error,” Mr. Ulczycki says. “Ninety percent of crashes taking place are caused by humans making mistakes."

According to the Centers for Disease Control, 33,804 people died in motor vehicle crashes in the United States last year.

“I would trust that equipment [in driverless cars] more than I trust humans because I see how humans drive every day,” Ulczycki adds. “We know how humans drive and cars that are all driving in a safe manner and have a level of predictability of how the other vehicles are going to behave will result in much safer roadways and probably more efficient roadways.”

“We’ll probably get where we’re going more efficiently, more safely, because the human component that causes much of the disruption on our streets and freeways will be decreased, diminished and disappear entirely.”

Russell agrees that a move to fully-automated driving roadway systems “will be for the better until somebody has one accident where a system has failed and then everybody will be marching around saying ‘look how horrible these are, look how unsafe they are.’ They’ll look at the one, versus how many that would save.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.