How technology is helping us map earthquakes faster than ever

By using a combination of satellites, seismographs, and open-source platforms, researchers are now able to quickly map the damage caused by an earthquake, such as the one that devastated parts of Nepal on Saturday.

Navesh Chitrakar/Reuters
Chinese rescue team members work on a laptop during the rescue operation to rescue live victims trapped inside the collapsed hotel after an earthquake in Kathmandu, Nepal, on Monday.

In the aftermath of the earthquake in Nepal on Saturday, technology has stepped into the information gap to help map the terrain for first responders using GPS, satellite, and open-source data.

Researchers at the US Geological Survey, the University of Iowa, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and other groups expect to have the first post-earthquake images to come from satellites – due to pass over the affected regions on Tuesday morning, Nepal time – which they will use to create three-dimensional images of how the earth moved during the quake.

These images will aid in directing relief efforts effectively and conducting science that may lead to a better understanding of earthquakes and their early warning systems, says William Barnhart a geoscientist at the University of Iowa who formerly worked with the USGS and who is assisting the agency on this work.

On Saturday, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake struck less than 50 miles from Kathmandu, leveling buildings and killing more than 4,000 people, according to reports.

The quake, the country's biggest in eight decades, triggered an avalanche on Mt. Everest, which killed at least 18 climbers. Tremors were felt in India, Tibet, and Bangladesh.

Soon after the quake hit Nepal, those on Twitter and other social media networks began searching for reports from those on the ground in affected areas in order to help gauge the damage and assist relief efforts to the area.

One effort, The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team “applies the principles of open source and open data sharing for humanitarian response and economic development,” according to its website.

The team asks those living in the affected areas to help out by reporting which buildings are damaged, which are still standing, and where fissures and other quake damage are located.

According to Prof. Barnhart, it’s as important to report a building that’s still standing as it is to report one that’s gone down, so we can assess the infrastructure.

Barnhart explains that the data used to map a quake is collected from several different sources.

Seismograph readings can, within 30 minutes, report a quake's location, magnitude, impact, and potential monetary damage estimates. A seismograph, which measures the movement of the earth, consists of a ground-motion detection sensor, called a seismometer, paired with a recording system.

Publically accessible open source platforms involve people in the affected zones reporting damaged and undamaged buildings, fissures and other damage.

Then there is local GPS station data, which, when combined with satellite data, is called geodetic data.

“We’re still trying to obtain as much of this information as possible,” he says. “The GPS data is run by various universities internationally, some are recording in real time, some are not so right now we’re waiting for that data to come out.”

At the moment, some of that data still has to be “telemetered,” or sent from the GPS server on the ground so that the USGS can access it.

“In a case like this I think many of those networks were telemetered through Kathmandu,” he says. “It’s tough right now, because so much of the infrastructure in the country has been damaged so severely and the data is dependent on the infrastructure to get out.”

USGS is also using remote sensing, a combination of satellite data from optical satellites as well as radar satellites, according to Barnhart.

This is not the kind of GPS data that a source such as Google Earth could provide, he says, “For GPS data to be useful it has to be very close to the earthquake, because it’s sensing the actual physical permanent ground displacement caused by the earthquake.”

“The GPS, it has to be right in the zone of the earthquake itself otherwise it doesn’t record anything,” he says.

Meanwhile, seismometers can be distributed globally because they’re sensing the seismic waves that travel through the entire planet.

The term for using of GPS to accurately measure, map and understand the Earth is called geodesy, and it’s playing a significant role in making sure limited resources go to where they are most urgently needed in Nepal this week.

Barnhart says it is also the next step to take in early warning systems here in the United States that would allow for a quicker shutdown of schools and nuclear facilities in a seismic event, tsunami, or landslide.

“Right now a lot of work is going into actually using these geodetic networks in earthquake early warning,” he says. “Until now earthquake early warning has been traditionally within the realm of seismology only. But there can be a lot of ambiguity when an earthquake starts to happen – from a seismological perspective.”

Barnhart concludes, “The nice thing about geodesy is that if you have several GPS stations along a fault and you can see them unrolling in real time and they move one or two meters, you don’t even need to know the magnitude of the earthquake is. You know a big earthquake just happened. So a lot of work is being done right now by researches to incorporate GPS into early warning systems.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.