Reactions to the solar eclipse: Was it as epic as hoped?

Viewers share their best – and not-so-great – views of the solar eclipse in all of its glory.

Luca Bruno/AP
The moon starts to block the sun during a solar eclipse over a statue in Milan, Italy, Friday, March 20, 2015.

Parts of Europe experienced a total solar eclipse on Friday, in which the moon almost entirely blocks the sun, leaving a mesmerizing ring of fire.

The total eclipse only lasted a few minutes, although it took several hours to reach completion. It was not visible anywhere in the United States. Only a few residents and visitors of the Danish Faroe Islands and the Norwegian island group of Svalbard experienced the eclipse in its fullness. Britain, a few other European countries, and parts of Asia and Africa experienced partial eclipses, reported USA Today.  

Jay M. Pasachoff, an astronomer and director of Hopkins Observatory at Williams College, has traveled to see 58 eclipses since 1959, reported The New York Times. An expert on the corona, the sun’s outermost layer that only becomes visible during an eclipse, he chases eclipses to not only study the sun but experience its beauty.

“We’re here for the science, yes,” Dr. Pasachoff wrote in 2010, while he awaited an eclipse in Easter Island. “But there’s also the primal thrill this astronomical light show always brings – the perfect alignment, in solemn darkness, of the celestial bodies that mean most to us.”

The best place to view the total eclipse was reportedly Svalbard. Despite warnings of frostbite and polar bear attacks, 2,000 people ventured to the island and were rewarded with clear skies and 2.5 minutes of a sunless morning.

“It was just fabulous, just beautiful and at the same time a bit odd and it was too short,” Mary Rannestad of Minnesota, told The Guardian.

Hilary Castle from London also shared with The Guardian: “I was just blown away. I couldn’t believe it.”

While some got to experience spectacular views, others were subject to cloudy skies and dreary weather. Across the UK, eclipse-viewer hopefuls gathered outside, and expressed their frustration on Twitter when they could not see what was taking place behind the clouds.

[Editor's note: An earlier version of this story included an embedded tweet containing an image that had been digitally altered. The Monitor regrets the error.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.