Wildebeest attack prompts calls from gnu-control advocates

A worker at a North Carolina zoo spent a week in the hospital after being thrown into the air twice by a wildebeest.

Melanie Stetson Freeman / The Christian Science Monitor.
A herd of blue wildebeest cross the road in Kruger National Park, South Africa, in 2002.

A worker at a North Carolina zoo suddenly found herself trying to fend off an irate wildebeest last week in an attack that left her hospitalized.

WSOC, an ABC-affiliated television station in Charlotte, reports that the staff at Zootastic Park in Troutman, N.C., were taking schoolchildren through the park in a wagon on Oct. 27. One mother arrived late with her children, so the staffers radioed Kimberly Hillman, a bookkeeper at the zoo, and asked her to drive them to the wagon where they could join the rest of the group.

When Ms. Hillman exited the car with the mother and children, a wildebeest approached. Hillman made a shooing gesture, which the huge antelope apparently took it the wrong way.

“It hit her, threw her up in the air. She hit (the) ground, it picked her up again and threw her up in the air, and I was getting off the tractor at the time and I ran and got between her and the wildebeest,” Zootastic owner Scottie Brown told WOSC.

The station reports that Hillman spent about a week in the hospital before being released.

Brown told WOSC that in future the zoo will more strictly enforce its existing policy of prohibiting anyone from being outside a vehicle while in the park.

Both species of wildebeest are native to Africa. The larger of the two, the blue wildebeest, is native to the southern and eastern parts of the continent. The smaller one, the black wildebeest, is limited to South Africa.

Attacks on humans by zoo animals are rare. When one does happen, it's almost always when a visitor or staffer enters the animals' enclosures. Last month, a 3-year-old boy at an Arkansas zoo tumbled into a jaguar exhibit, where he was bitten by the big cats before the child's father and grandfather frightened them away by throwing objects at them.

Zootastic is not currently listed among the institutions accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, which accredits permanent animal exhibits according to safety and welfare standards stricter than those required by law. 

The AZA's accreditation requirements state that "animals which pose a serious threat of catastrophic injury," a category that includes as "large hoofstock,"  "must be equipped with appropriate alarm systems, and/or have protocols and procedures in place which will notify staff in the event of a bite injury, attack, or escape from the enclosure." The organization also requires annual live-action drills for injuries, escapes, and other emergencies. 

According to the AZA, fewer than 10 percent of the 2,800 animal exhibitors licensed by the United States Department of Agriculture are accredited.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.