For many in US, the solar eclipse could be eclipsed by clouds

An early-season nor'easter is to blame for the widespread cloud cover in the Eastern US that threatens to obstruct the view of the moon as it passes between the sun and the Earth.

Science@NASA
This graphic, provided by NASA, shows which parts of the globe will be able to see the partial solar eclipse of Oct. 23, 2014.

Viewers throughout most of the United States are in position to see a partial solar eclipse Thursday afternoon (Oct. 23). Unfortunately, clouds will likely get in the way in some parts of the country.

One of those regions is the northeastern United States, including all of New England. In addition, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia will also fall victim to widespread cloud cover that could scuttle attempts to view the partial solar eclipse.

The culprit is an early-season nor'easter, a low-pressure storm system sitting off Cape Cod that will generate lots of clouds. The clouds may also be accompanied by areas of rain, drizzle and fog. So extensive are the nor'easter's effects, in fact, that clouds might even extend as far west as West Virginia and Ohio. [Partial Solar Eclipse of October 2014: Visibility Maps]

You can watch the solar eclipse webcast at Space.com beginning at 5 p.m. EDT (2100 GMT), with live feeds available from the Slooh Community Observatory, Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles and the University of Arizona's SkyCenter at Mount Lemmon.

Over the nation's midsection, a band of high- to mid-level cloudiness extending from Minnesota and the eastern Dakotas south to Oklahoma and through central Texas might allow for only some occasional glimpses of the eclipse.

The clouds might be thin enough at times to allow viewers to see the eclipsed sun, but even so, prospective viewers are strongly warned not to stare at the sun. Even though its visible light might be considerably reduced, our star's dangerous ultraviolet and infrared wavelengths will still penetrate the clouds and can damage your eyesight without your immediately being aware of it. View a solar eclipse only indirectly, orwith appropriate filters.

Across much of Washington state, Oregon and Northern California, a cold front moving inland from the Pacific Ocean will probably generate cloud cover as well as scattered precipitation, which likely will hide much, if not all, of the solar eclipse from view.  

Finally, a band of cloudiness over south Florida could also cause problems for some viewers in the Sunshine State.  

Most other locations should have good to excellent viewing conditions for the eclipse. People in the north-central and northwestern United States will see the greatest percentage of the solar disk covered by the moon — nearly 70 percent in Juneau, Alaska, for example, and 64 percent in Seattle.

As one heads farther east, less of the sun will be covered by the moon. Near the Atlantic seaboard, the sun will either set before the peak of the eclipse is reached, or before the eclipse has even begun.

As a bonus, people in some locations might see the edge of the moon graze or hide an unusually large sunspot now nearing the middle of the solar disk. Those using safe solar filters can readily see this large spot, known as Active Region 2192, with their naked eye.

For the latest forecast in your neighborhood, check the National Weather Service to find the direct link to the National Weather Service Forecast office that serves your local area.

Editor's Note: If you take an amazing skywatching photo of the partial solar eclipse or any other celestial sight that you'd like to share for a possible story or image gallery, please contact managing editor Tariq Malik at spacephotos@space.com.

Joe Rao serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York's Hayden Planetarium. He writes about astronomy for Natural History magazine, the Farmer's Almanac and other publications, and he is also an on-camera meteorologist for News 12 Westchester, N.Y. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.