Bizarre moon structures: How did they get there?

Planetary scientists once suspected that the vast depression on the moon was an impact crater caused by an asteroid collision. New analysis of data collected by NASA's GRAIL mission suggests otherwise.

Courtesy of NASA/Colorado School of Mines/MIT/JPL/Goddard Space Flight Center
The moon as observed in visible light (l.), topography (c., where red is high and blue is low), and the GRAIL gravity gradients (r.). The Procellarum region is a broad region of low topography covered in dark mare basalt. The gravity gradients reveal a giant rectangular pattern of structures surrounding the region.

Even though its been more than four decades since humans first set foot on the moon, Earth's lone natural satellite still holds many mysteries.

“Virtually everyone who has ever lived has looked up at the moon; and many of us have wondered, ‘How did those dark areas get there?’” says Maria Zuber, geophysics professor and vice president of research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

Now, planetary geophysicists say they have finally unlocked the secrets of a mysterious dark patch known as the Oceanus Procellarum, or Ocean of Storms.

Scientists have previously speculated that the vast lunar depression may have been caused by an impact with an asteroid or comet. But now a new analysis of gravitational data gathered by NASA’s GRAIL mission suggests that the ridges around the depression are more likely remnants of an "ancient magma plumbing system."

Planetary scientists have known for years that some of the dark splotches on the moon seen from Earth were likely carved by lava. That lava had to have come from the interior of the moon, but there was no explanation for how it found its way to the surface, until now. The answer, it seems, has to do with the moon's gravitational field.

Everything that has mass exerts some degree of gravitational pull on the objects around it, explains study lead author Jeffrey Andrews-Hanna, who runs the Planetary Geophysics Lab at Colorado School of Mines in Golden, Colo. On an object as large as our moon, variations in density and topography can be detected by looking at variations in the gravitational field.

In 2011, NASA'S Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory mission sent two identical probes to study such fluctuations in the moon's gravitational field. As the twin GRAIL spacecrafts circled the moon, these fluctuations in gravity alternately caused the probes to pull ahead of each other as they passed over particularly dense lunar formations, explains Dr. Zuber, principal investigator on the GRAIL mission.

For a total of six months, these two crafts recorded the path of their dance around the moon, all the while transmitting their positions down to Earth, where researchers at MIT and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasedena, Calif. painstakingly calculated the subtly varying distances between the two.

“The beauty of this is it's an extremely simple measurement,” Zuber says. “It’s basically elementary school geometry but with the power of technology behind it.”

The technology that Zuber refers to enabled the researchers to measure changes in velocity of the two spacecrafts to a couple of tenths of a micron per second.

“We are essentially measuring in a second distance changes that are a fraction of the size of a human red blood cell,” Zuber says.

Using that data, Dr. Andrews-Hanna was able to construct a map of the moon’s gravitational field with far superior precision than ever before.

“We’ve measured gravity at the moon before, but it’s a little bit like the difference between an X-ray and an MRI machine,” Zuber says.

Andrews-Hanna’s map revealed previously unseen features of the Oceanus Procellarum.

“In the data we see these masses tracing out this giant polygonal data and we see almost a rectangle on the surface of the moon,” Andrews-Hanna says.

Had the Oceanus Procellarum been caused by an impact, its outline would likely have been more round, Andrews-Hanna explains. His analysis suggests that these rifts are evidence of buried tectonic structures rather than the outer rim of a crater. He further posits that the formation of these rifts may have opened up pathways for magma to ooze to the moon's surface.

Andrews-Hanna is not exactly sure how those rifts might have formed, but he has an idea. Because, the moon does not have tectonic plates like the Earth, they must have been formed differently from the way our mountains evolved.

“The one thing that’s really unique about this region is inside of this rectangular pattern of rift valley, we see a high concentration of radioactive elements like uranium, thorium, and potassium, which are really important heat producers,” Andrews-Hanna says.

These radioactive elements produce a lot of heat and drive activity within planets and other celestial bodies.  Over time, as the radioactive elements decay, they become cooler.

“This area would have started out hot and cooled with time; And as solids cool they contract,” Andrews-Hanna says. “This region would have been cooling and contracting and would essentially pull away from its surroundings; And that would cause extension at its edges.”

There aren’t really any structures on Earth that compare in scale to this formation, Andrews-Hanna adds. But the same phenomenon occurs on a much smaller scale when mud puddles dry and crack.

The researchers published their findings in the October 2 issue of Nature.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Bizarre moon structures: How did they get there?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today