Scientists one step closer to a working quantum computer

Researchers have developed a 'five-qubit array,' furthering the development of a fully functional quantum computer.

Erik Lucero
The five cross-shaped devices are the Xmon variant of the transmon qubit placed in a linear array.

Building a quantum computer can be tricky.

Unlike classical computers, which store information in bits, or binary digits represented by 0 or 1, a quantum computer uses qubits, or quantum bits to store information. A qubit can have a value of 0, 1, or both at the same time, potentially allowing quantum computers to solve certain problems – such as searching databases or factoring prime numbers – far faster than their classical counterparts.

But building a computer with subatomic components is challenging, to say the least.

Scientists have now developed a "five-qubit array" that could bring us one step closer to the first fully functional quantum computer. The findings of the study appeared in the journal Nature on Thursday.

"Quantum hardware is very,very unreliable compared to classical hardware," Austin Fowler, a staff scientist in the physics department, and a co-author on the paper said in a press release. "Even the best state-of-the-art hardware is unreliable. Our paper shows that for the first time reliability has been reached."

Quantum computers are made up of thousands of qubits. For the computer to function, the qubits need to be arranged in a two-dimensional array. Through quantum entanglement, the qubitsform a "logical state" that, to work properly, needs to have a low error rate. It is difficult to achieve such an arrangement because qubits themselves are faulty, said graduate student and co-lead author Julian Kelly, who worked on the five-qubit array project. Therefore, error correction is necessary.

The researchers reduced the error in controlling individual qubits to the levels required for error correction. "This paves the way for creating logical structures with low cumulative error using many entangled qubits," lead author Rami Barends, a postdoctoral fellow with the group and Kelly wrote in an email. 

They built the qubits in certain geometrical shapes that could be controlled, coupled, or isolated on demand. Five cross-shaped qubits named Xmons were placed in a single row to ensure that each one talked to its nearest neighbor.

Scientists achieved this "threshold of performance of the qubits" which arranged in a five-qubit array model can operate with an acceptable margin of error. Also, the probability of the state of one qubit disturbing the state of a neighboring qubit is extremely low, a necessity for building larger arrays. 

But we are still a long way from having a fully functional quantum computer.

“If you want to build a quantum computer, you need a two-dimensional array of such qubits, and the error rate should be below 1 percent,” said Dr. Fowler. “If we can get one order of magnitude lower — in the area of 10-3 or 1 in 1,000 for all our gates — our qubits could become commercially viable. But there are more issues that need to be solved. There are more frequencies to worry about and it’s certainly true that it’s more complex. However, the physics is no different.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.