Lowly Y chromosome may deserve some respect after all

Yes, the Y chromosome separates the guys from the gals, but scientists didn't think it was good for much else. New research indicates that in humans the Y includes a set of multitasking genes that regulate cells throughout the male body.

The chromosome that separates males from females appears to play a much larger role in humans than just determining who gets what set of reproductive plumbing. It also carries a hardy set of genes that regulate functions in every cell throughout a male's body, as well as the behavior of genes throughout his genome.

That is the implication of two new studies that look at the evolution of the Y chromosome, which has retained a small set of genes that have survived millions of years of evolution.

Indeed, "it looks like the Y has the potential to do a lot of regulation, from the earliest stages of development right after fertilization all the way to adulthood in every tissue," says Winston Bellott, a researcher at the Whitehead Institute at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass., and the lead author of one of two papers on the topic set for publication Thursday in the journal Nature.

As researchers dig deeper into the actions of these genes, the results also could help explain why some diseases are more prevalent in men or women or why their responses to the same disease differ, he adds, providing insights for new therapies.

That's quite a role change for the once-lowly Y. For years, researchers viewed the Y chromosome as a genetic wasteland, good for little else but serving up a male reproductive system. Since then, researchers have found that the Y chromosome holds some important genes, but even these were related to male fertility.

Moreover, the Y chromosome's tumultuous evolutionary history prompted predictions that the chromosome, and perhaps men, would vanish in a few million years. Some 300 million years ago, the X and Y chromosomes shared a common collection of genes, from which they diverged. X chromosomes today have retained some 98 percent of these original genes, while the Y chromosome has retained a scant 3 percent of these common ancestral genes.

Yet that 3 percent represents a tenacious bunch.

Two years ago, another member of Dr. Bellot's team, which included 29 researchers from three institutions in the US, published a comparison of Y chomosomes from humans with those of chimpanzees and rhesus macaques. The comparison showed that the human version lost one ancestral gene some 25 million years ago, when the lineage of mammals that would lead to humans diverged from those that would lead to rhesus macaques, but then stabilized to retain its current complement.

In this latest study, the team added increasingly remote mammalian relatives – marmosets, mice, rats, bulls, and opossum – essentially to the base of the mammal family tree. In addition, the team analyzed chromosomes from chickens.

Chickens? Birds have chromosomes that allow researchers to see what the X and Y chromosomes were like before they diverged.

"Looking at the chicken is like getting the passenger list for the Titanic when it left England," Bellot says. "Each of these Y chromosomes is like looking at a different life boat to see who got picked up."

In this case, the persistent survivors are 36 ancestral genes on the Y chromosomes across each of the mammals in the sample that have a comparable gene on the X chromosomes.

A second team, led by University of Laussane researcher Henrik Kaessmann, analyzed the Y chromosomes from 15 mammals across a wider range of mammals and traced the origins of the Y chromosome as far back as 180 million years ago, when placental mammals and marsupials diverged. Theirs is the other paper appearing in Thursday's Nature.

Two genes in particular survived in placental as well as marsupial mammals, Bellott explains, suggesting that "the genes survived because they were special and not because they were just lucky."

It turned out that the survivors were important to key biological processes in mammals.

"They are expressed across more tissues across more developmental stages" than the genes that vanished, Bellott says. "And they seem to be regulators of many more genes" than were governed by the genes that didn't survive.

In a sense, he says, the Y chromosome became more streamlined, with evolution stripping it to its essentials, rather than randomly growing increasingly degenerate over time.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.