Goats are not as dumb as you think, say scientists

Goats are actually quite intelligent. They have excellent long-term memory and prefer to learn things on their own, say scientists.

Brian Squibb
New research from Queen Mary University of London shows goats learn how to solve complicated tasks quickly and can recall how to perform them for at least 10 months, which might explain their remarkable ability to adapt to harsh environments.

When most people think of a goat, the word "intelligent" doesn't immediately leap to mind.

But a new study challenges this perception, indicating that goats are not only good at performing complicated tasks, they also have an "excellent long-term memory."

The findings of the study were published in a paper titled "Goats excel at learning and remembering a highly novel cognitive task" in the journal Frontiers in Zoology today.

At Buttercups Sanctuary for Goats, in Kent, UK, researchers initially exposed 12 goats (7 males and 5 females of various breeds) to a puzzle-box mostly used for studying primates. This involved a complicated two-step foraging task where first the goats had to pull out a lever with their lips or teeth using a string. They then had to lift the lever up using their mouth or muzzle to get at the food (one or two pieces of dry penne pasta and a few grass pellets) that dropped from a dispenser into a feeding bowl.

Two of the goats had to be removed from the experiments, because they tried to use their horns instead of their muzzles and "therefore risked damaging the box," say researchers.

Like most animals, the goats needed a demonstration at first to show them how the task was done, says Alan G. McElligott from Queen Mary University of London, who is also the senior author on the paper. After subjecting them to a few demonstrations most of the trained goats (9/12) successfully learned the task; "on average, within 12 trials," according to the authors.

Researchers also wanted to study social learning behavior among goats. Therefore, before the learning sessions, some of the goats also watched other goats completing the task. In this case, the goats did not learn the task faster. This goes to show that goats "learned through individual rather than social learning," researchers noted in their paper.

To further test their long-term memory, after an interval of 10 months, the scientists challenged the same lot with the same foraging experiment. All of them instantly got to the food in a matter of seconds, says McElligott. The longest one took about 2 minutes, he added. This time they were not exposed to any demonstrations.

"The speed at which the goats completed the task at 10 months compared to how long it took them to learn indicates excellent long-term memory," said co-author Dr. Elodie Briefer, now based at ETH Zurich in a press release.

The study explains why goats are so "successful in colonising new environments, though we would need to perform a similar study with wild goats to be sure," McElligott said.

Individual learning abilities of goats along with their long-term memory suggest that "domestication has not affected goat physical cognition. However, these cognitive abilities contrast with the apparent lack of social learning, suggesting that relatively intelligent species do not always preferentially learn socially," say authors.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.