How a manicurist helped solve a sea-turtle mystery

Using non-toxic manicure acrylic along with old wetsuits and hair-extension glue, scientists have successfully attached solar-powered satellite tags to turtles' shells, to learn more about about the sea creatures' early life history.

Jim Abertheny, NMFS permit 1551
In order to learn about the "lost years" of a turtle's life, loggerhead turtles with small, solar-powered satellite tags were released into the ocean.

The shell of a loggerhead turtle is basically a giant fingernail.

Or at least that's a useful way to look at it when you're trying to come up with a way to attach a solar-powered satellite tag to one. 

A team led by University of Central Florida biologist Kate Mansfield was developing the tags to get a glimpse of the turtles' "lost years," the interval that begins when the hatchlings, just over an inch long, disappear into the seas off Florida’s east coast and when they return, at almost 18 inches long, to shallow waters near the shore. 

The plan was to equip 17 captive loggerhead turtles with the tiny tags and then release them into the ocean. But the scientists didn't know how to get the tags to safely stick to the shells. That's where the manicurist came in.

Turtle shells, it turns out, are made of keratin, the very same substance that makes up human hair and fingernails. 

Florida Atlantic University biologist Jeanette Wyneken, a member of Mansfield's team, got the idea of checking in with her husband's manicurist. Her husband, professionally a marine biologist, plays classical guitar, an activity that often requires careful shaping and protection of the fingernails.

"He has very delicate nails," Wyneken says of her husband. "So his manicurist uses a certain kind of acrylic nails that keep them sort of intact."

Wyneken checked with the manicurist and reasoned that non-toxic manicure acrylic could be safely applied to a very small part of the turtles' shells, and that it would stay put. The acrylic "basically helps to stabilize the shell," Wyneken says.

Biologists had earlier believed that turtles went around the Atlantic in large circles by entraining themselves with the currents associated with the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. "Imagine following a doughnut around a circle," Dr. Manfield says.

But after tracking the turtles for 27 to 220 days, scientists have found that after hatching, some of these small, fast-growing, migratory species apparently move to different habitats, such as the Sargasso Sea, which is rich in floating Sargassum, a type of seaweed. 

Scientists suggest it is possible that turtles take the detour toward the Sargasso Sea in search of warmer habitats, for foraging purposes, or simply to  escape from predators.

According to the findings of the study, published in a paper titled "First satellite tracks of neonate sea turtles redefine the ‘lost years’ oceanic niche" in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. the turtles stayed away from Continental Shelf waters to escape predators and they mostly stayed at the sea surface for a thermal benefit.

“This makes sense because the turtles are cold blooded animals. By remaining at the sea surface, and by associating with Sargassum habitat, turtles gain a thermal refuge of sorts that may help enhance growth and feeding rates, among other physiological benefits.”

Earlier knowledge about sea turtles, a globally endangered species, came mostly from rare opportunistic sightings offshore, or from laboratory studies.

“With real observations of turtles in their natural environment, we are able to examine and reevaluate existing hypotheses about the turtles’ early life history. This knowledge may help managers provide better protection for these threatened and endangered species," said Mansfield in a press release.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.