Early galaxies were formed through collisions of 'baby' galaxies

Early gas-rich galaxies were formed after they collided with each other, causing massive explosions that resulted in the formation of a huge number of stars, according to a study.

NASA, ESA, Z. Levay and R. van der Marel (STScI), and A. Mellinger/Reuters
The sky is seen at night just before the predicted merger, about 3.75 billion years from now, between our Milky Way galaxy and the neighboring Andromeda galaxy, in this NASA photo illustration.

Scientists might have just solved the conundrum surrounding the formation of massive galaxies. 

A study titled "Submillimeter Galaxies as Progenitors of Compact Quiescent Galaxies," carried out by astronomers from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute and published in The Astrophysical Journal, found that the enormous galaxies that existed a long time ago were actually formed by collision of other small "baby" galaxies.

What was surprising for Sune Toft, astrophysicist
at the Niels Bohr Institute, who was involved with the study, was the sheer size of these galaxies, which were as big as today's spiral galaxies and the largest elliptical galaxies. 

These galaxies formed very early in the history of the universe, grew into massive structures, completed the process of star formation and then got exhausted – all in a span of a few billion years, he says. Moreover, "the stars in these early galaxies were squeezed into a very small area," he said. "This means that the density of stars was 10 times greater. Furthermore, the galaxies were already dead, so they were no longer forming new stars. It was a great mystery," said Dr. Toft.

So what really happened to them?

Toft turned his attention toward starbust galaxies that existed when the universe was between 1 and 2 billion years old (most astrophysicists think that the universe is about 13.8 billion years old). A starburst galaxy is one that is undergoing a very high rate of star-formation. Using high-precision telescopes, he measured the light from these galaxies and reconstructed the galaxies using computer models, he says.

"I compared these distinct starburst galaxies to the galaxies that are dead simply because, these dead galaxies, like the current starbust galaxies, were gas rich and formed stars with such speed that they soon burned out until there was no gas left for the formation of any more stars," he says. Within such galaxies, stars are formed at an extreme rate, almost 1,000 times faster than our Milky Way, Toft told the Monitor. 

When these gas-rich galaxies collide, the impact  is so huge that gases present in both the galaxies are driven to the center causing a huge explosion that gives rise to a lot of stars. But in the process, the gas to form new stars is also used up extremely quickly, and then you get a dead galaxy, he said. 

The new research sheds light on the formation process of the enormously massive and dead galaxies in the early universe, as well as the formation of stars under extreme conditions, he says. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.