Texting can make you walk funny, say scientists

Tapping out a text message while walking can make you weave, dawdle, and maybe even topple over, new research indicates. 

Melanie Stetson Freeman/The Christian Science Monitor
Commuters text as they walk into and out of South Station at the end of the workday in the financial district in July 2010.

If you're reading this on your phone while walking right now, please give this article a very close and thorough read. Take a moment to mentally block out anything that might possibly distract you, and just focus on the words on the screen.

There. Notice how you walked into that lamp post? Science can now explain that.

A team led by University of Queensland researcher Siobhan Schabrun filmed people walking while using their phones and then analyzed their gaits using movement analysis software. The results: if you're fiddling with your smartphone while walking, you're more likely to dawdle, weave, and possibly even lose your balance.

Common sense, of course, will tell you that using your phone while walking will make you walk funny. But it takes scientists to tell you precisely how much it makes you walk funny.

To that end, Dr. Schabrun and her team had 26 subjects walk a straight line of 8.5 meters (about 28 feet) while sending a text message, reading text on the screen, and not using a phone at all. Each subject had reflective markers stuck to various parts of their bodies and was filmed with eight motion-capture cameras.

The team found those who texted tended to walk more slowly and deviate from the line. To keep their phones steady, these perambulating texters would also tend to move their arms and heads in sync with their chests, causing their heads to wobble side to side. Those who read text on their screens performed these silly walks too, but not as much.  

"Texting, and to a lesser extent reading, on your mobile phone affects your ability to walk and balance," said Schabrun in a press release. "This may impact the safety of people who text and walk at the same time."

"Texting and Walking: Strategies for Postural Control and Implications for Safety" appears in the current issue of the journal PLoS One.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.