10 common scientific misconceptions

Did you grow up believing in any of these science myths? From baby birds to flushing toilets, we debunk common 'facts' that are often just a form of misconstrued science. 

6. Seasons are caused by Earth's distance from the sun

Watch these Harvard men and women fail to grasp the full concept of seasons. This 1989 video asked alumni and faculty at a Harvard commencement why Earth has seasons. A majority of them held misconceptions about the science of the seasons or the phases of the moon.

A sensible explanation for the seasons is that Earth is closer to the sun during the summer, and farther away in the winter. Actually, in the Northern Hemisphere, the opposite occurs. 

Seasons are caused by Earth's axial tilt, not its distance from the sun. Earth rotates at a tilt of about 23.4 degrees, so that summer occurs in the hemisphere that's closer while winter happens in the hemisphere that's tilted away. It's true that the entire Earth is closer to the sun during some parts of the year than others (it circulates in an ellipse, not a perfect circle). However, summer actually occurs in the Northern Hemisphere when the Earth is farthest from the sun, simply because it's tilted toward the sun at that time.

One 2002 Estonian study by Eve Kikas asked 198 teachers to evaluate the validity of four explanations of the seasons. Of the 30 physics and chemistry teachers surveyed, 67 percent found explanations based on misconceptions either mainly or totally correct. Yet 93 percent also identified the correct explanation as mainly or totally true. A few researchers claim that the general confusion may stem from the diagram used to show Earth's elliptical orbit around the sun, which may leave teachers to reason that distance determines the seasons.

6 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.