Does altitude determine the way we speak?

A University of Miami anthropologist discovered a link between languages that possess a certain consonant sound and their altitude. Does geography shape how our languages sound?

Guillermo Granja/Reuters
A Quechua man draws on his partner's face before a dance performance in Ecuador in 2011. A University of Miami anthropologist has found that languages of people living at high altitudes, such as Quechuan, tend to have certain consonants that are absent in lower-altitude languages.

As anyone who has ever been to a hog-calling contest or a middle school cafeteria can attest, humans are capable of producing all sorts of sounds. But most languages take advantage of only a small portion of these. English, for instance, has just 42 or so distinct sounds, a fraction of our species' vocal capabilities. 

So why do some languages pick up some sounds and eschew others? Most linguists have assumed that it's more or less random, but a new study suggests that geography might play a role.

One particular type of sound called the ejective consonant, a sort of puh, kuh, or tuh noise produced by creating a pocket of air in the throat and compressing it. We don't have ejective consonants in English, but about one in five languages have them, mostly in eastern and southern African languages, and in indigenous languages in the western parts of North and South America. Ejective consonants can also be found in the Caucasus.

University of Miami anthropologist Caleb Everett noticed that languages of people living at high elevations tend to have ejective consonants and that those in low-lying areas tend to lack them. He went through the World Atlas of Linguistic Structures Online, a huge database of languages and their phonological, lexical, and grammatical properties, and compared them with the geographic coordinates and elevations of the languages' locations.

Of the 567 languages that he analyzed – about 8 percent of the 6,909 or so human languages – Dr. Everett found that about 87 percent of languages with ejective consonants have their origins within about 300 miles of high elevation points, defined as regions about a mile above sea level or higher.

Why is this so? Everett suspects the rarefied air found at high altitudes makes it easier to hold air pockets in the throat. "Since atmospheric pressure is reduced at higher elevation," he writes in the current issue of the journal PLOS ONE, "we speculated that this compression would be more easily achieved in locations of relatively high elevation."

In his study, Everett also offered a second possible explanation. It could be the case, he writes, that ejective consonants tend to mitigate the loss of water vapor. As chatty mountaineers tend to quickly discover, talking too much at altitude can lead to dehydration. Ejective consonants tend to expel less vapor than those originating in the lungs, so it could be that our languages are shaped by our bodies' water conservation strategies. Or it could be a combination of both explanations.  

Everett's is not the first study to link human sounds to geography. A paper in 2004 noted a correlation between sonority – that is, those with more frequent vowel sounds and a greater amplitude – and proximity to the equator. Linguists suggest that cultures in warmer places rely on speaking across greater distances.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.