Bermuda Triangle doesn't make the cut on list of world's most dangerous oceans

A new report from the WFF has identified the most dangerous oceans for ship wrecks imperiling underwater life.

Denis Doyle/AP
Fishermen look out to sea at the port of Malpica in northwestern Spain in November 2002. Fishing was prohibited indefinitely along a 500 kilometer (310 mile) stretch of the northwestern Spanish coastline after the stricken Bahamas-flagged tanker Prestige sank that month.

Jack Sparrow had a bit of an ego – and for good reason. The Caribbean seas in which he swashbuckled 300 years ago, downing merchant ships for their loot as he plied the water, were dangerous, full of rival pirates low on morals.

Today, though, Sparrow would have less to brag about. In a new study released by WWF, the Caribbean didn’t make the list of most dangerous seas. Neither did the Bermuda Triangle, despite persistent urban legends.

Instead, the South China Sea and East Indies, the east Mediterranean and Black Sea, and the North Sea and British Isles were found to be the hotspots for watery disaster, not from piracy, but from the high frequency of shipping accidents that imperil both human and marine life.

At the same time as ocean traffic has steadily increased worldwide, oversight of the industry has failed to keep pace, according to the report. The problem is especially acute near Southeast Asia, where cargo carriers make quick trips between the region’s booming, but often poorly regulated, ports. Over the last decade, the South China Sea has had more shipping accidents than any other water body, according to the report.

That uptick in ocean traffic, and the lack of global cooperation to manage the congestion, has also come with climate change and more bouts of extreme weather. About half of all accidents today are caused by when a boat founders, leaks, or splits in two, according to the report.

That’s troubling news. Beneath those ships – often ferrying black gold – is a different kind of treasure: coral reefs, like Asia’s Coral Triangle. Douses of oil or other toxic substances from wrecked ships can do serious environmental damage to those underwater cities bustling centers of marine life.

“Since 1999 there have been 293 shipping accidents in the South China Sea and east Indies, home of the Coral Triangle and 76 per cent of the world’s coral species,” said Simon Walmsley, Marine Manger at WWF International, in a press release.

Overall, shipping accidents are down 27 percent worldwide over the past decade, according to a January report from Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty Insurance. One hundred and six ships sank last year, up from 91 the previous year. On average, 146 ships are lost each year, the report said.

"As the global fleet continues to expand rapidly and begins to operate routinely in more risky areas the probability of accidents and likely severity of impacts will again increase unless precautionary measures are put in place to address identifiable risk factors,” said the press release.

In 2002, in one of the worst accidents, the Prestige oil tanker sank off the Spanish coast when one of its tanks burst, plunging 70,000 tons of oil into the Atlantic Ocean

The Prestige oil spill caused not only environmental impacts but economic losses estimated at €8 billion [about $10.5 billion]. Even small scale accidents in very sensitive environments, like the Great Barrier Reef, can have profound environmental consequences.” said Dr Walmsley, in a press release.

Not all accidents involve an oil spill: fishing vessels account for about a quarter of sunk ships, and general cargo ships account for roughly half percent of lost vessels. Still, depending on the product the ship was carrying, those sinkings can still have consequences for fragile marine ecosystems.

Feel guilty, Jack Sparrow.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.