Bigfoot 'proof' available, says caller

A 911 call with claims of Bigfoot 'proof' started an online frenzy. The investigating officer concluded the footprints belonged to a bear, but the 911 caller remains convinced it was Bigfoot.

It's Bigfoot! Or is it? A 911 call in the Altoona, Penn. reported "proof" of Bigfoot.

A group of Bigfoot enthusiasts promptly investigated the claim, and the police released this partial transcript to them:

Person 1: “[an individual] called 911 advising that he contacted the Game Commission to call him back; wants a police officer to come to his residence. Apparently he has proof there of Bigfoot.”

Officer: “Bigfoot, right?”

Person 1: “That’s affirmative, he has evidence, uh … proving Bigfoot. He would like a police officer to come there."

An officer responded to the 911 call and found John T. Winesickle, who told him he'd found Bigfoot tracks when out for a walk. The officer accompanied Mr. Winesickle to the tracks, and took pictures of them.

His conclusion: The large tracks were made by a big-footed creature, all right: a bear.

Winesickle remains convinced that it was Bigfoot, a creature he has believed in since childhood.

Winesickle, a lifelong resident of Pennsylvania, said has seen Bigfoot – and its female companion – a few times, describing them as skittish creatures who occasionally emerge from the mountain laurel in the woods behind his home.

Winesickle has encountered black bears on his walks before, but not grizzlies. He'd first thought that this was a grizzly, he said, but became convinced it was a Bigfoot because of the foot-like shape of the print, the upright gait, and the ability to climb steep inclines on two feet.

"This year I got Bigfoot's tracks," Winesickle  told a local radio station. "And later on, I got the female's foot." He said that the male Bigfoot had six toes, but the female's track was more human in scale – "like my foot" – and had only five toes.

Bigfoot routinely makes "six-foot steps when he walks," Winesickle said, but he measured one longer stride at 9 feet. 

Winesickle also heard Bigfoot speak, he said, in a voice so deep it would put a bear to shame, let alone a bass singer. The female's voice was higher, he added.

Bigfoot sightings have been reported many times, but sightings have never been accompanied by enough proof to convince biologists. Most reports come from the Pacific Northwest. Yeti sightings, of a Bigfoot-like creature covered in white fur, have emerged from the Himalayas.

Scientists and Bigfoot enthusiasts agree that most reported sightings are either hoaxes or animal misidentifications.

Some enthusiasts argue that Bigfoots are descended from Gigantopithecus blacki, an enormous creature whose fossil remains have been found in China. Most researchers dismiss those theories as speculative, since Gigantopithecus was a quadruped whose fossils have never been found in North America.

Others have argued that Bigfoots are remnant Neanderthals, despite Neanderthals' small stature and the fact that no Neanderthal fossils have been found in the Western Hemisphere.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.