Are birds evolving to dodge cars?

Cliff swallows might be evolving shorter wings, which allow them to evade cars more quickly, suggests new research. 

Current Biology, Brown et al.
Birds may be evolving new traits or learning new behaviors in order to avoid becoming road kill, new research suggests.

To avoid becoming road kill, birds may be evolving to have new traits such as shorter wingspans that allow better maneuverability, new research suggests.

The researchers, who detailed their results today (March 18) in the journal Current Biology, found that the number of cliff swallows hit by cars has declined dramatically over the last 30 years.

Those swallows that do get hit tend to have longer wingspans, suggesting evolution is selecting for birds with shorter wingspans, which can turn away from passing cars more quickly.

"It's possible to observe evolution occurring in contemporary time. Over a 30-year period, we've seen natural selection for birds that are able to avoid being hit by cars," said study co-author Charles Brown of the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma. "The work also illustrates that some animals can adapt relatively quickly to these urbanized environments."

Accidental conclusion

Scientists have shown that animals, such as Darwin's finches, can evolve to have adaptations to new environments in mere decades. But documenting how animals are evolving to adapt to rapid urbanization is trickier.

Brown and his colleagues wound up doing so by accident.

The researcher has spent decades studying cliff swallows, a social, colony-forming bird that nests near highways, train tracks and overpasses.

While visiting a study site in Nebraska over the last 30 years, Brown picked up the carcasses of swallows felled by passing cars for his taxidermy hobby. Every time he saw a dead bird, he collected it and meticulously detailed its characteristics.

A pattern gradually emerged: fewer and fewer swallows. When he checked his statistics, Brown confirmed that the number of birds ending up as road kill declined dramatically, from 20 in 1982 to four in 2012.

That led the research team to wonder whether specific characteristics made some birds more prone to getting hit. And indeed, scientists found with further research that road kill swallows had slightly longer wingspans than 134 cliff swallows accidentally killed during netting over the same time period.

The team speculates that birds with longer wingspans have a harder time turning on a dime or making a vertical takeoff. As a result, birds with longer wingspans would become road kill more often because they'd be slower to swerve out of the way of oncoming cars.

One conclusion is that cliff swallows underwent evolution over the last 30 years to select for more maneuverable birds. It's also possible, however, that the birds have somehow learned to avoid getting hit, Brown told LiveScience.

And the rapid adaptation to roadways may not be unique to cliff swallows.

"I suspect that we'll see similar patterns with other species, but the data just don't exist," Brown said.

The study doesn't prove that the total number of road kills has actually declined, because the sample of birds is small and incomplete, said John Faaborg, an ornithologist at the University of Missouri, who was not involved in the study.

"There are not enough dead birds" to make a conclusion, Faaborg told LiveScience.

In addition, cliff swallows congregate near heavily trafficked areas, so it's difficult to extrapolate conclusions to other species that see less traffic, he said.

Follow Tia Ghose @tiaghose. Follow us @livescience,  Facebook  or Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.