K. Catania
The Eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus) is the first mammal found to smell in stereo.

Study: Moles can smell in stereo, still can't see anything

A study involving the common mole discovered that they can locate the source of an odor based on how strong it smells in each nostril. The burrowing animals are still useless when it comes to perceiving things visually, though.

Most mammals can hear in stereo, locating sounds in their environment by comparing the inputs between both ears. Now it appears some mammals use their nostrils the same way for finding smells.

Scientists have long debated whether mammals have stereo scent, the ability to locate a smell based on the strength of odors arriving at each nostril. A new study shows that the common mole (Scalopus aquaticus), found throughout the eastern United States, Canada and Mexico, uses such an ability to sniff out its prey, a researcher reported today (Feb. 5) in the journal Nature Communications.

Neuroscientist Kenneth Catania of Vanderbilt University led the study. Initially, Catania thought the moles' nostrils were too close together to detect odors in different amounts. But his research proved otherwise. "The fact that moles use stereo odor cues to locate food suggests other mammals that rely heavily on their sense of smell, like dogs and pigs, might also have this ability," Catania said in a statement.

Nosey moles

In an experiment, Catania placed a mole in the middle of a semicircular arena with food (bits of earthworm) placed at particular locations around its perimeter. The arena was in a sealed container, and by noting the change in air pressure, Catania was able to detect when the mole sniffed.

The moles found the food morsels in fewer than five seconds and went straight to the correct location every time, Catania said. He noticed that the moles would follow the same pattern: One would enter the chamber, move its nose back and forth while sniffing, home in on the food, and go directly toward it. [The 10 Weirdest Animal Discoveries]

Next, Catania blocked one of the moles' nostrils with a small plastic tube. When a mole's left nostril was blocked, its path skewed toward the right, and when its right nostril was blocked, its path bent toward the left. The moles were still able to find the food, but it took much longer.

The reach of stereo scent

Then Catania put the moles in a chamber where the food was always directly across from the entrance. Moles with both nostrils unblocked went straight toward the food, but when one nostril was blocked, the moles again veered to the opposite side.

The work strongly resembles a well-known study of barn owls' hearing conducted in 1979 by Eric Knudsen and Mark Konishi of the California Institute of Technology, Catania said. In that study, blocking one of the owls' ears led the animals to misjudge the source of a sound.

In another experiment, Catania put a hollow plastic tube in both of the moles' nostrils and crossed them, so that each nostril sniffed air from the opposite side of the animal. This time, the moles sniffed around and often couldn't find the food at all.

Stereo scent has been found in sharks and other animals before, but whether other mammals possess the ability remains to be seen. Some evidence suggests that stationary rats can be trained to sense flowing air, but no one has studied them behaving naturally (not in the lab). If humans have stereo scent, it appears very weak — humans can only tell which nostril is more strongly stimulated when a smell is strong enough to cause irritation of the nostril lining, studies suggest.

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Study: Moles can smell in stereo, still can't see anything
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today