Costa Rica earthquake: scientists saw it coming

A magnitude 7.6 earthquake hit Costa Rica Wednesday, rattling buildings in the capital, San Jose. Scientists had been cautioning that the region was due for another major quake soon.

Juan Carlos Ulate/REUTERS
People gather in front of the Supreme Court after being evacuated from their buildings following an earthquake in San Jose, Costa Rica, Wednesday.

A powerful earthquake struck western Costa Rica Wednesday morning, prompting tsunami warnings for the Costa Rican west coast, as well as the coasts of Panama and Nicaragua.

Initially estimated at magnitude 7.9, the quake's intensity has been reduced to magnitude 7.6, according to the US Geological Survey.

The temblor was centered some 25 miles below the surface on the Nicoya Peninsula, a popular destination for ecotourism.

In the Costa Rican capital of San Jose, 87 miles east of the quake's epicenter, residents reported severe shaking that rattled utility poles and sent water sloshing out of swimming pools, according to the Associated Press. So far, no casualties have been reported.

Costa Rica's west coast lies along a subduction zone where one mobile plate in Earth's crust – the Cocos Plate – is plunging beneath the Caribbean Plate. This action has formed the Middle American Trench, which parallels the coastline offshore. This subduction zone also is responsible for raising a string of volcanoes that runs up the country's interior.

Subduction zones are responsible for the most violent earthquakes the planet's restless crust delivers, researchers say. The reason: The surface areas involved in subduction quakes, where the two plates are in contact with each other as the fault slants downward toward the Earth's interior, typically are far larger that the surface areas involved in the rupture of so-called strike-slip faults, such as California's San Andreas Fault. When a portion of a subduction zone locks up, it takes larger amounts of accumulated strain to overcome the friction locking the segment.

Indeed, during the past decade, researchers studying the seismic history of the Nicoya Peninsula have been cautioning that the region was due for another major quake soon.

The Nicoya Peninsula last saw an earthquake of comparable magnitude in 1950, according to Jeff Marshall, a geologist at California State Polytechnic University in Pomona. That quake registered a magnitude of 7.7 and led to dozens of casualties, heavy damage to buildings, up to seven feet of uplift along the peninsula's coastline, and soils in some regions that in effect liquefied with the shaking. That quake's epicenter appears to have been fairly close to the epicenter of Wednesday's quake.

Because the peninsula is home to subduction-style quakes that result in significant changes in the height of the coastline, the peninsula has become a Mecca for geophysicists studying such quakes, Dr. Marshall notes in an online summary of his research there.

In addition to the general scientific interest in subduction quakes, he notes that the pace of development on the peninsula is high and occurring "without heed for the lurking earthquake hazard."

Getting a better handle on the seismic and potential tsunami risks there could help government officials and the public at large better understand the risk the region faces, he suggests.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.