Why Earth still absorbing our carbon dioxide?

Our planets ocean's and plants are soaking up unexpected levels of manmade carbon dioxide, but scientists say we cannot count on nature to do so indefinitely.

NOAA/ESRL
Atmospheric samples collected around the world have greatly refined estimates of growth of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. Above, a sampling station on the Antarctic Peninsula.

While humans are emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, the planet sucks some of it back up.

A new study indicates that natural, carbon-removing processes, have not yet reached capacity, in spite of humans' increasing emissions over recent decades.

The oceans can absorb carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, as can trees and other vegetation.

"Globally, these carbon dioxide 'sinks' have roughly kept pace with emissions from human activities, continuing to draw about half of the emitted [carbon dioxide] back out of the atmosphere," said study researcher and climate scientist Pieter Tans, with the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Laboratory, in a statement. "However, we do not expect this to continue indefinitely."

The researcher team, led by Ashley Ballantyne of the University of Colorado, analyzed 50 years of global carbon dioxide measurements.

Humans emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere primarily through burning fossil fuels and through other activities. Plants take up carbon dioxide as they grow and store it in their tissues, and the oceans can also absorb it from the atmosphere. This latter process has its own drawback: Carbon dioxide drawn into the oceans causes them to acidify. Ocean acidification is seen as a serious threat to the health of ocean ecosystems.

Earlier work has suggested that these natural gas-sucking processes might be falling behind, leading to a faster-than-expected rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The new results suggest this hasn't happened yet, rather they show these carbon-dioxide sinks continue to pull about half of people's carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.

"Since we don't know why or where this process is happening, we cannot count on it," Tans said in a statement. "We need to identify what's going on here, so that we can improve our projections of future (carbon dioxide) levels and how climate change will progress in the future."

The research is detailed in Thursday's (Aug. 2) issue of the journal Nature.

Follow Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry or LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.