Rodent thieves explain mystery of tree survival

Thievery by rodents moved an estimated 87 percent of seeds beyond the immediate vicinity of the parent tree, according to a study.

Pearson Scott Foresman
Rodents, such as rabbit-size agoutis, carry away seeds and bury them, creating caches of stored food.

Large-seeded trees in the American tropics have posed a mystery: How have the young trees survived, when local wildlife can’t swallow the fruits and seeds whole and transport them away from the parent tree?

The fruits can be up to 4 inches (10 centimeters) in diameter, and researchers have proposed that, many millennia ago, the enormous animals of the Pleistocene, including the relatives of elephants and mastodons, did the job of consuming the fruit and dropping the seeds elsewhere. But those animals are long gone, and today, smaller animals inhabit the region.

Now, scientists report they’ve found the seed spreader: thieving rodents.

Rodents, such as rabbit-size agoutis, carry away seeds and bury them, creating caches of stored food. Until now, scientists didn’t think rodents such as agoutis were up to the task of handling the large seeds. For one thing, the animals didn’t appear to carry the seeds far enough away from the parent tree to give seedlings a good shot at establishing themselves.

But prior work didn’t take agoutis’ thieving ways into account.

An international team of researchers, led by Patrick Jansen of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, followed the fate of 589 black palm seeds on Panama’s Barro Colorado Island by attaching transmitters to the roughly 1.2-inch (3-centimeter) long seeds, with the orange fruit scraped off. They also followed the movements of 16 clearly identifiable agoutis, and monitored 154 agouti caches with remote cameras for a year.

They found that the agoutis raided each others’ caches, moving seeds to new locations, which were themselves then plundered by other agoutis.

One seed was hidden as many as 36 times, traveling more than 2,460 feet (749 meters), and ending up 920 feet (280 m) from its starting point, when it was dug up and eaten 209 days later, the researchers write in results published online today (July 16) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This thievery moved an estimated 87 percent of seeds beyond the immediate vicinity of the parent tree, according to the study.

What’s more, only a fraction of the seeds removed from the initial cache — about 13 percent — were eaten, and an estimated 14 percent of cached seeds survived to the next year, when new fruit became available to distract the rodents, they found. 

Rodents and large-seeded plants such as the black palm have a very old relationship that dates to before the Pleistocene, the researchers noted.

"These plants may have a long history of seed dispersal by rodents, and perhaps never depended on megafauna (large animals) in the first place," they concluded.

Follow Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry or LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook Google+.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.