Will scientists announce discovery of Higgs boson? Buzz is building.

Chatter suggesting that the Higgs boson – the theoretical source of all mass – has been found is mounting. But if that's true, the 'God particle' will raise questions of its own.

Anja Niedringhaus/AP/File
In this file photo, a physicist explains the ATLAS experiment on a board at the European Center for Nuclear Research, CERN, outside Geneva, Switzerland. The illustration shows what the long-presumed Higgs boson particle is thought to look like.

The buzz is building as physicists prepare to present the latest results in their hunt for the Higgs particle – the key to answering the question: Why does matter have mass?

The definitive statement about what scientists involved in two major experiments at European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva have found and their levels of confidence in the results comes early Wednesday morning. But one blog that has developed a reputation for reliable – if unofficial – analysis of forthcoming research has already predicted that scientists have found the long-sought particle.

In his blog, viXra Log, independent British physicist Philip Gibbs combined data from the two experiments at CERN as well as two experiments at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill. His analysis "favors" the presence of some sort of Higgs particle. 

The discovery of the Higgs particle would be momentous because it would vindicate scientists who theorized that its existence would explain a core mystery of physics. Three independent groups of physicists first proposed it in the 1960s to explain why fundamental particles – the most basic building blocks of matter – had enormous differences in mass.

In particular, wondered why electrons, which whiz around the nucleus of an atom, are ultralight, while quarks, which make up the protons and neutrons in the nucleus, are heavier.

The theorists' proposed answer was that the universe is permeated by a universal field that gives particles mass. The amount of mass a particle takes on, then, depends on how strongly it interacts with this field, called the Higgs field.

But how would anyone know such a field exists? In quantum physics, fields have subatomic particles associated with them – detected or hypothesized. The electromagnetic field has the photon, for instance. The Higgs field is predicted to have the Higgs boson.

Without Higgs, the so-called Standard Model of physics is incomplete. The Standard Model describes the properties of the 16 particles – including quarks and electrons – that form the fundamental building blocks of the universe. It also explains three of the four forces that govern their interactions – the strong force (which binds particles that make up atomic nuclei), the weak force (which governs radioactive decay), and electromagnetism. Gravity is the only force yet to be explained by the Standard Model. 

The discovery of the Higgs boson would be exciting, because it would fill one of these remaining gaps, says Meenakshi Narain, a researcher at Brown University in Providence, R.I., and a member of one of the two teams at CERN that will report its results. But, she adds, merely saying it's found would not answer the really interesting questions.

If the Higgs boson exists, Dr. Narain says, she wants to know how it decays. 

Theories suggest Higgs can exist only at the very high energies that existed right after the Big Bang, the enormous release of energy that physicists credit for giving rise to the universe some 13.6 billion years ago. In fact, Higgs could have existed naturally only during the first millionth of a millionth of a second after the Big Bang. Then, it would have decayed into other particles as the universe cooled.

CERN's Large Hadron Collider can accelerate two beams of protons to nearly the speed of light before steering them into head-on collisions that generate energies comparable to those earliest fractions of a second after the Big Bang. Detectors pick up the signatures of a shower of particles the collisions create, including particles that are the lower-energy byproducts of a Higgs boson's decay. By analyzing the debris, researchers can work backward to determine the types of particles that created it – the approach they are using to identify the Higgs boson.

Currently, theories predict that the Higgs boson decays along five different paths at the same time, each producing its own unique mix of lower-energy particles. Each of the five blends of decay particles is thought to be present in specific proportions. But if any one of those proportions is off by a significant amount, it would send theorists back to the chalkboard, Narain explains.

"That's when, as a physicist, it gets really exciting," she says.

Indeed, blogger Dr. Gibbs's analysis yielded an odd outcome for one of these paths. He noted that the oddity could result from errors in the original measurements or in the approaches the various teams used to figure out ahead of time what a Higgs signature in the debris might look like. 

Teasing out the information on decay paths requires more data than the CERN teams have amassed so far, Narain adds.

But turning up the unexpected is something "I would very much like to happen," she says. "If we find it, I hope is is something non-standard."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.